In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness |
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
|
|
Please forward this to others who might find
it useful. If you have a
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link:
https://www.mindconnection.com
|
|
1. Good News: Where the Intel is Good
Fighting Communism
-
JD
Vance on transparency in medical care:
https://x.com/i/status/1848767522021199894
-
A citizen speaks at a City Council meeting in the People's Republic of
Chicago:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1848873556706529311
-
Elon Musk on why he got involved in the fight for freedom:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1848086472437760083 (2:02)
-
This Louisiana senator explains why he left the Democrat Party to become
a Republican:
https://x.com/i/status/1850227836445159766 (4:07).
-
A similar sentiment to the above:
https://x.com/i/status/1850245976877097380 (4:54)
-
And this one, as well:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1850024471375081785 (1:01)
-
Winsome Sears, an immigrant (from Jamaica) earned her citizenship
through military service and is now Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania.
Here is what she says on allowing illegal aliens to vote:
https://x.com/i/status/1850289675941847328
-
Boeing's new CEO has ended the DEI insanity that has caused so much
incompetence within the company and killed so many airline passengers.
It's about time. He even announced that the company is implementing
"merit-based hiring".
|
Tuesday the 5th
This day will decide whether we have a low-IQ sociopath taking us
quickly down the path to being Venezuela redux, or we have a proven
executive taking us toward a bright future. If you want the latter and
not the former, get out and vote. If you want the former and not the
latter, stay home and use the time to plan your move to Venezuela.
Censorship
- This newsletter (and sometimes this whole website) has repeatedly been
subjected to censorship. That did not happen prior to the coup. It is
very clear to me that voting for Cackling Kamala means voting for more,
and harsher censorship. Not just because she was a cold, heartless,
heavy-handed DA who ruined the lives of innocent people. But also
because her fingerprints are all over everything the ruling communist
regime does.
- A decade ago, it was inconceivable that Russia would take a strong
position against communism. Or that its communist antagonist would be a
USA-based quasi government. But that is exactly what happened. Russia
recently fined The People's Republic of Google for its censorship of
Russian citizens. On 30 October, the story appeared in the UK
Independent. The amount is $2.5 decillion. I had no idea what that
meant, so I looked it up. It's $2.5 trillion, trillion, trillion. A
trillion is a 1 followed by 12 zeroes, so a decillion is a 1 followed by
36 zeroes. There's not that much money in the world, so one scratches
ones head as to the award amount. A quick search revealed there are $80
trillion in the world. That's $80 followed by 12 zeroes.
$2,500,000,000,000 is $2.5 trillion. Add 24 zeroes to the right of that,
it's insane. But so is communism, and apparently Russia has had their
fill of it coming from Google.
Trump (Pass these along)
- Dr. Naomi Wolf on Trump:
https://x.com/i/status/1851410357752848539
- Brett Favre, at a rally for Trump in Green Bay, WI:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1851749226180391098
- Here is a link to the Rogan podcast with Trump:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/0e9ynAH6hmZIIeOx0SaGQu?si=SsnEBQp7TEypsnLwarJHkQ&nd=1&dlsi=19f77c1ea0b844bb
(3 hrs)
- RFK gives some of his reasons for saying that a vote for Kamala
is a vote for nuclear war:
https://x.com/i/status/1849531763326095545 (5:25)
- RFK. Very moving 40 second statement
https://x.com/i/status/1852190505028735340
- The communists keep comparing Trump to Hitler, and they went way
overboard with this nonsense in reference to the 27OCT Madison
Square Garden event. Michael Rappaport makes some good points here:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1849823420113928660.
-
Powerful Trump ad, please show this to Trump Derangement Syndrome
victims you know:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1850552716575056256
-
Peter Navarro stumping for Trump:
https://youtu.be/keWXvbsPu1c
-
Senator Marshall on Farmers and Trump:
https://youtu.be/btPucblhn7c
(1:02)
-
North Carolina man gives uplifting impromptu speech and prayer for
Trump:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1848396616585125967
-
The New York Post officially endorsed Trump on 24 October.
-
Tucker Carlson on why Trump will win (barring massive cheating or sane
people staying home instead of voting):
https://x.com/i/status/1850667483935686853
-
Army Lt Col Warren Douglas Quets, father of a US Marine murdered in
Mexico, speaking at a Trump rally:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1852147574817591564
-
The Washington Post, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, was ordered by
Bezos himself to not endorse any candidate for POTUS (this was only the
second time since 1976). On the one hand, Bezos is a very smart guy who
understands that communism doesn't work so he is not going to help
Comrade Kamala. He's also seen thousands of Amazon Marketplace sellers
suffer terribly under our current regime (Amazon has done exceptional
things to help these sellers, despite having to lay off its own people).
But on the other hand, he's had a long-running dispute with Trump who
went into child temper tantrum mode over criticism of him that appeared
in the WP. So Bezos won't publicly endorse Trump either. That said, you
can rest assured that he's voting for Trump and privately advocating for
others to do the same. Because he's not stupid.
The C*O*V*I*D* Scam
- The University of Santa Cruz requires all students to be "up to date"
on the experimental gene therapy (which has zero benefits and enormous
harms) and the worthless flu shot. This policy raises the question, "If
Santa Cruz University is this stupid about admissions, how can anyone
trust the quality of their educational programs?" If I were a student
there, I would bring this barbarity and stupidity to the attention of
key alumni and major donors, right after finding a science-friendly
university to transfer to.
- Bill Gates has been summoned to The Netherlands to face seven
victims of his propagandizing the infamous experimental gene therapy
and pushing for mandates. . Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, is another
defendant. Will the Dutch court rule on the side of science, or will
it rule on the side of Gates and Bourla?
- On 23 October, a federal jury in U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California reached a verdict that resulted in
rail transit officials being ordered to pay more than $7 million to
6 transit workers were fired for refusing to undergo the
experimental gene therapy that was hyped as a "vaccine" against a
virus that put nobody at risk of death other than those who already
have one foot in the grave. This verdict is remarkable, considering
the jury was impaneled in Trans Franscisco, home of Pfizer shilll
Nancy Pelosi.
- On 29 October, the Southwest Idaho Health District, covering
about 30 public health clinics, voted 4-3 to remove the experimental
gene therapy shots from its facilities. This is a huge breakthrough.
The Election Scam
- Just a reminder: The people who are against Voter ID wanted you
to show "vaccine" papers.
- According to the latest from RealClearPolling.com, 64.3% of
Americans say the country is on the wrong track. That is an
appalling statistic, because it means 35.7% of Americans are
ignorant, stupid, insane, or some combination thereof. That is, over
1/3 of people of polling age are mentally incompetent and are thus
disenfranchising others each time they cast a ballot. We have our
work cut out for us.
- The election fraud is in full force. Fortunately, this time
around there are efforts to stop it. Watch this video from the
Lancaster County District Attorney:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1849866335834210472 (4:06)
The Carbon Scam
- I've been prevailing upon my utility company to stop publishing
disinformation about "green" energy. This is an ideology that
ignores all data and assumes that intermittent energy sources such
as wind and solar are carbon-free (they are almost as
carbon-intensive as coal). I was pleased to see in their latest
newsletter to their customer base, the utility published information
about natural gas (which has a much lower carbon footprint than wind
or solar). If your utility has been promoting ideology instead of
science, contact them and ask them to publish science instead of
ideology.
- Those of us who bother to be informed understand that the current
solar cycle and the recent massive volcano spewing of 150 million tons
of water (far more potent a greenhouse gas than CO2) have driven climate
variation, including the recent large hurricanes (far larger ones were
recorded many decades ago) much more than human activity. We also know
that on the world CO2 emissions map the USA is almost completely white
while China and India are almost completely black (the darker the color,
the higher your CO2 emissions). Yet, there are morons who insist we as a
nation must destroy our economy and they spew their ignorance every time
there's a major weather event.
- Here is an exchange between a "reporter" (left wing zealot working
for a lamestream media outlet) and Governor Ron DeSantis:
Moron reporter:
"When will the words 'Climate Change' come out of your mouth?"
DeSantis:
"The chance of me virtue-signalling for people in the media is
zero, so do not count on that. I don't subscribe to your religion.
And it's just a tired refrain and song and dance. I get you have an
agenda, I understand that, I think you should be more honest about
what that would mean for people, taxing them to smithereens,
stopping oil and gas, making people pay dramatically more for
energy, we would collapse as a country. So, this whole idea, of
climate ideology driving policy, it just factually can't work. So in
Florida, our energy is gonna be affordable and reliable. That's what
you're gonna do, that's the only way you can adequately respond to
things like we've just seen with the storms to get people hooked
back up."
The CK (Cackling Kamala) Scam (pass these along)
- A nice summation of just how bad a choice CK would be for POTUS:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1847995939715162200
- Not exactly church-friendly:
https://youtu.be/6iUCD_Allng
- Senator Marshall (KS) released this video:
https://x.com/i/status/1848820495103185316
- Mel Gibson responds to journalist:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1849587621246140851
- You've probably seen this parody:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIz-aoZFzM4
- Senator John Kennedy on Kamala:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1850559567739982248
- An accountant explains Kamala's most radical financial policies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTKVv5Mm9_M.
- This ad is devastating to Kamala:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1850210241255772667
- It turns out that newspapers, which are notoriously far-left,
have their limits of stupidity and delusion. Normally, they back
whatever criminal or socialist (Clinton, Obama, Biden) is the
regressive candidate. But every day of late, it seems some paper or
another has announced it refuses to endorse Kamala.
- Hundreds of commentators on the Washington Post website
cancelled their subscriptions because the WP didn't endorse anybody
for POTUS. Yeah, that's more of their idea of "diversity". They
simply cannot tolerate anyone who doesn't coddle them and their
delusional ideology. What's great is Bezos doesn't need to beg for
subscribers, so these idiots won't be missed.
- The New York Post recently endorsed Trump, further eroding
Kamala's dismal performance in New York. She is currently polling
with the worst New York numbers for any Democrat in decades.
- An Auschwitz survivor takes Kamala to task for her "Hitler"
comments, praises Trump :
https://twitter.com/i/status/1849858729866559964 (1:40).
Pass this along to any Trump Derangement Syndrome people you know.
- The most recent jobs report, ginned up a bit past the point of
credibility, still shows a dismal situation. And it's come out only
days before the election.
- Puerto Rico really IS a floating garbage site. They have garbage
electricity (still not recovered from 2017!), and a government so
corrupt it boggles the mind. During Trump's first term, his
administration started addressing this. During Trump's second term,
which he wasn't allowed to serve, Biden-Harris totally ignored the
fine people of Puerto Rico even though they are our fellow citizens.
The more the communists push the lie that Trump hates Puerto Rico,
the more Puerto Ricans CK will alienate. Being the low-IQ person
that she is, along with a staff all suffering brain damage from the
full "vaccination" schedule of the clot shots, she's going to
continue slinging this particular mud and getting 99% of it all over
herself.
- Low IQ is clearly a requirement to be in the CK camp. Take a
look at this moron, who struggled for a minute and a half when her
teleprompter went blank:
https://x.com/i/status/1852534132615544851. She has no clue what
she's even endorsing CK for; more word salad.
Other News
- On 29 October, political prisoner Steve Bannon was released from
prison. And to this date, there is zero evidence he committed any
crime! When China lectures us on human rights, maybe we should
listen.
- Not only are vaccines for humans totally experimental due to not
having to be tested for efficacy or safety, so are pet vaccines. Do
not get any unless required by law. A similar caution applies to mAb
drugs like Solencia for cats or its canine equivalent Librela.
- In the USA, Amazon is virtually alone in fighting Temu and its
various illicit practices such as selling shoddy, and often unsafe,
goods at very cheap prices. In the EU, by contrast, the government
has stepped up to take on Temu. But then, the EU is not run by Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris.
|
2. Product Highlight
We got a great deal on these Premium lids for retrofitting Harley Davidson
motorcycles with 6x9 speakers, and can pass the savings on to
our customers. Click on the image to be taken to our Amazon store, where you will
see these and other offerings including:
- American Hard Bag aftermarket sound system parts for Harley Davidson
motorcycles
- CAT tools
- Cold Steel knives
- Connex radios
- Dosy meters
- Flexilla hose connectors
- Funko collectibles
- Galaxy 10 meter and 11 meter (CB) radios
- Hogue pistol grips
- iRV products for RVs
|
 |
- Liberty Monitors security cameras
- Metra saddlebag lids
- Mike Holt Electrical Exam Preparation products
- Minigadgets hidden camera CO detectors and receptacles
- Nagy's aftermarket sound system parts for Harley Davidson motorcycles
- Optoma projectors
- Paraben Consumer data recovery sticks, porn detection sticks, and
similar diagnostic/ IT tools
- Plantronics headsets
- RealSAM Pocket, which is a voice operated Galaxy smart phone for the
blind
- Rigid Tools work lights and related
- ROK straps
- Rostra universal cruise control kits
- Sig Sauer pellet guns
- SmartPens4U Rocket Pen Reading Tutor Scanning Pen | Case | Case Bundle
- Texas Ranger radios (Chuck Norris not included, sorry)
- Uniden radar detection systems (hard-wired)
- Victron DC power modules and related
- Wera Tools
- WeWalk Smart Cane "Cane with a Brain" for the blind
|
3. Brainpower tip
An acquaintance of mine obtains his "information" by asking people for their
opinions and then either picking one he likes best or believing that one of them
must be an expert. Yes, in case you are wondering, he went the full mask and jab
route. His approach does not work, because he gets opinions instead of facts.
An opinion is a view that is not based on fact or knowledge. The very nature of
opinions renders them useless for many things. It's fine to have an opinion that
purple is a great color. Maybe it's your favorite. Opinions that are expressions
of likes and dislikes do not need to be based on fact or knowledge to be valid.
"My favorite vacation destination is New York City" is just as valid as "My
favorite vacation destination is the Ozarks."
Example of being dead wrong
This same acquaintance tried to tell me that running my heat pump was less
efficient than running my natural gas furnace. I replied to him that is true in
very cold weather, but did he mean even in moderately chilly weather? His reply
was that a natural gas furnace always uses less energy than a heat pump. Which
is an opinion, and which is false. So I asked him why he believes this.
He said he knows it's true because the service guys at [heating and cooling
system company] told him that, and since they work on this equipment they would
know.
This is where he went wrong.
First of all these furnace techs are not furnace engineers. They work from a
checklist and a procedure. Though well-trained in what they do, they usually do
not have even an associate's degree. He's basically asking an EMT to perform
brain surgery. I told him I'd heard their opinions, myself. They consider a heat
pump to be the same as a set of resistance heating coils and that is not at all
the case. The electricity is used to run a pump, not to heat a metal red hot.
The energy usage difference between the two methods is huge.
Second, to do the analysis requires data that these techs are not privy to.
They don't work at Trane as design engineers, they don't have a lab where they
conduct tests and measure how much energy is consumed per unit of heat
generated. They simply follow a procedure for tuning a heating system, one
system at a time.
The kind of analysis required would involve extensive use of calculus and/or
computer modeling. It would typically fall on someone with a PhD or at least a
Master's Degree. This person, or this team, would need to assess a wide range of
furnaces and a wide range of heat pumps under a wide range of conditions. They
would need to know how to normalize and characterize data, and perform all that
other statistical work.
How he could have gotten it right
All of this analysis has been done for us, however. And not by furnace techs.
Above temperature X, a heat pump uses less energy than a gas furnace to keep
your house warm. X depends on several factors, such as the design of the heat
pump (newer ones are much more efficient than older ones) and the condition of
the heat pump. For my particular heat pump, X was 35 degrees at the time it was
installed. I have the crossover to gas set at 50 degrees because even though
there's still an energy usage advantage below that the pump is having to draw
from less outdoor heat to make the indoor heat and thus the warming effect is
slower. I made this change based on my opinion, which is that I like it to warm
up faster rather than slower.
All my acquaintance had to do was consult the literature that is published by
the manufacturers. There, he could have seen the pretty graphs with the energy
usage arcs, read the theory of operation (a fundamental requirement when
evaluating a system), seen a ton of other data, and read the conclusions and
recommendations that follow from the data. The major manufacturers, such as
Trane and Carrier, make gas furnaces and heat pumps.
But is their information reliable? They have nothing to gain by duping you
into buying the wrong product or wrong technology. If I had lived in Nome,
Alaska, and asked Trane about a heat pump for my home they would have told me
it's a bad idea due to the temperature gradients of the area (not enough days
above 35 degrees). What these manufacturers are concerned about is their
reputation and also not being sued. It's not like Big Pharma where they can sell
a defective product that kills people and get away with it because their
lobbyists got them immunity from liability. Nor do the Big Pharma companies care
about their reputation, they have their shills at the CDC, the FDA, CNN, MSNBC,
and the communist party doing spin jobs, mandates, and bullying on their behalf.
Asking unqualified people their opinion when it's so easy to do your own
research makes no sense to me. But he does it this way because it's easy for him
to do.
More examples
Now, let's look at another way opinion and fact differ. Suppose you ask me
about the layout of your kitchen, and you have spaces for a small table at
either end. You also have a coffee maker at one end of your counter and a
microwave oven at the other. I could give you my opinion and say I'd like the
two tables swapped and the coffee maker should be next to the microwave. Or, I
could give you facts and say that based on what you prepare in your kitchen,
your layout would be more efficient with the microwave by the oval table instead
of having the coffee maker near it. Notice the difference?
Let's look at another example. You're a supervisor at a factory that does not
have a plant nurse. An employee fell hard onto the concrete. The EMTs are on
their way, and you are on the phone with them. Suppose you say the employee is
unresponsive. You say that because he's dazed and slow to answer your questions.
You have just made a medical evaluation that you are not qualified to make, and
you've misled the EMTS. Or suppose you say, "He's got a compound fracture of his
left arm." You might be right, but they have no way of knowing this so now they
have to waste time asking you questions. If you said, instead, "The jagged edge
of his wrist bone is poking through the skin," now you have given them facts
instead of a conclusion.
False logic
False logic leads to false conclusions. My neighbor came down with something,
and didn't feel good. We are about 6 weeks away from the start of the flu
season, yet she concluded she was sick because she did not get her flu shot this
year. I told her that's like you put your shoes on and this one time tie the
left shoe laces first. You get into an accident and conclude it's because of the
order in which you tied your shoes. The flu shot does absolutely nothing for us,
the main reason being it's based on whatever flu strain they had in Australia
during their flu season. We don't ever have the same virus they have, so
formulating a vaccine based on their virus is pointless for disease prevention.
All it does is provide Big Pharma with a useless product they can sell by gas
lighting people into taking it.
The correct way to prevent illness is to bolster your immune system. How to
do this is well-known, and it works extremely well. In my own case, I have not
been sick since 1971. I have used this method, not the vaccine method. Those who
use the vaccine method still get sick, because the vaccines simply do not work.
One reason people engage in false logic, especially in relation to medicine,
is wishful thinking. You prevent illness mainly through proper nutrition, and
you get it mainly through consuming highly processed foods. It's wishful
thinking that you can take a vaccine and prevent the consequences of giving up
food in favor of fake food. Yes, rest and exercise are also big factors. But in
our modern era, malnutrition drives disease. Well, at least until the widespread
dissemination of the experimental gene therapy falsely marketing as a a vaccine.
That EGT is driving illness today, such as turbo cancers (something new) and
myocarditis in young people. Those who were conned into undergoing the
experimentation relied on opinion (doctors, politicians, and actors do not work
in labs testing these medications) instead of facts (the Pfizer trials were
documented and I have a copy of the document) and more facts (we know that
making the body's immune system robust is an effective defense against disease).
Avoiding fake facts
When you have fake facts, you reach wrong conclusions. The good news is fake
facts are usually pretty easy to spot. They come in the form of opinions. Those
providing the opinions may sound authoritative and may have seemingly related
credentials (like furnace techs dissing heat pumps and doctors promoting
vaccines). But if you ask them about their data, you dumbfound them. Because
they have never seen it. Sometimes in response, they will gas light you with
more fake facts or engage in a tactic such as misdirection. It's always best to
do your own research, and by that I do not mean go online and look for opinions.
Look, instead for source documents, credible citations, and raw data.
- Beware of fake experts. Tony Fauci spent 40 years defrauding the
government by claiming his team could find a vaccine for AIDS. As this virus
mutates rapidly, this was an impossible goal. But he gas lighted and BS'd
his way to being the most highly-paid federal employee despite accomplishing
exactly nothing. No peer-reviewed paper has ever cited Fauci, which is
rather telling. His fake expertise was used along with his fake title to
give him fake credibility. The stupid stuff he said during the C*O*V*I*D
scam struck me as lines from a SNL skit or something the Babylon Bee would
write in a parody. But his stupid remarks were treated with reverence and
his stupid advice, which he had no actual expertise to provide, literally
became the law of the land. It was a shameful time for America.
- Beware of fake studies. Hill's Science Diet manufactures corn-based "pet
food". They con veterinarians into recommending this pet poison, and also
con them into offering it for sale in their lobby or waiting area. By
contrast, Blue Wilderness produces meat-based cat food and dog food (more
meat in the cat food, which makes sense). Despite its higher cost, Blue has
been gaining market share because people see a difference in their animals
and because people have been doing their own research and applying logic.
Hill's response to this threat was to commission a fake study that showed
grain-free foods cause heart problems in pets. That study has been debunked,
but its fake conclusion is still circulating because too many people fail to
think about this for even a microsecond or to do their own research. Some
will ask their vet, who has been brainwashed and incentivized by Hill's, and
then take that answer as the truth. Which it's not.
- Stay educated. In my 30s, I read about 50 books per year. Now at twice
that age, I have slowed down and read (or listen to the audio version) about
half that many per year. Among the audiobooks are the University Lecture
Series. I also subscribe to half a dozen high quality nonfiction magazines,
including one professional journal (IEEE Spectrum). Another change is I
watch documentaries in streaming video. A lot of them. Yes, many are
climbing-related but I get into other topics as well.
When someone spews nonsense about a subject, it is often the case that I
spot that right away because due to all of my reading and video learning I
already have a more than passing knowledge of it. It's also the case that
when I do encounter a bona fide expert my mind is fertile soil for what they
have to say. An example is that for years I have been reading Vaclav Smil's
column in the IEEE Spectrum. He's written over 40 books. When I listened to
the first audiobook of his, I was able to follow it nicely because I'd
already been taught by him for many years. When I watched a video interview
of him (about 35 minutes), I similarly was not lost or confused but instead
was able to take it all in.
|
4. Finance tip
The acquaintance mentioned in the Brainpower tip is a first-time homeowner, and
also a first-time home dweller (he grew up living in apartments). He sometimes
seeks my advice, and I always have the answer he needs because it's pretty basic
stuff and not only did I grow up in a house and have owned several of them, I
have spent all but a few years of my life in a house not an apartment. As the
2023/4 winter drew to a close, he sent me an e-mail asking me what my utility
bills are. I record these in a spreadsheet going back many years so I sent him
that spreadsheet (actually, it's a "workbook" of spreadsheets). Now remember,
this is the same guy who gave me grief over having a heat pump. I thought by
sharing that information I would reinforce what I told him there. This is not
what happened. A few hours after I sent that, he wrote a long and blistering
e-mail that started of with the assumption my house is "hermetically sealed". Of
course, it's not. He went on to describe all of the harms caused by hermetically
sealing your home, taking the position I was both stupid in general and
specifically ignorant about how to have a healthy home (his home is a pig sty,
mine is not--so this was rather absurd coming from him).
To avoid going down the proverbial rabbit hole, I said my house was not
hermetically sealed and the air exchanges were plenty. That was it.
His reply was more of the same vitriol, only this time hinting at my lack of
sanity. He based this on the fact that my electric bill was about 60% of what he
paid and my gas bill was less than half. This is a guy who lives by himself and
doesn't have much in the way of kitchen skills, yet has TWO refrigerators that
are each larger than mine and that each have an ice-maker in the door. This is a
guy who likes to leave his front door open with only the storm door closed--even
when it's below freezing outside.
Where he got his knickers in a knot is he keeps his house at 55 DegrF in the
winter and has his AC set at 80 in the summer while my own settings (which he
asked me about) are much more civilized. Yet his bills are significantly higher
than mine even though we live in the same area and thus have the same weather
conditions and same utility companies. It must be that stupid, ignorant Mark has
hermetically sealed his home. Only explanation!
I could understand how this disparity in utility bills despite his tortuous
thermostat settings would be upsetting to him. So I decided to wait a few days
before replying, in hopes his [whatever it is] would have a chance to reboot.
Then I wrote back that my home has two exterior cat doors, and because a tiny
animal must push the thin pane open with his or her nose these are deliberately
designed to have extremely low "trigger pressure". That means the door does not
fit tightly and there's a lot of leakage around it relative to its size. Thus I
have a steady supply of outside air except when I close these off with an
insulated cover (aka, a Styrofoam cooler) in extreme cold. I went on to say I
have premium windows and premium doors, all of which are sealed and
hyper-insulated around their frames versus the typical ones that have
significant thermal leakage around their frames. I listed some other energy
improvements I had made, such as adding extra insulation in the attic and about
a dozen others.
I then said that my air exchange was actually greater than the air exchange
in a typical home, but the heat exchange was less (assuming the resident didn't
stand with the door open talking to someone on the porch). Even so, I went on to
say, my air exchange needs were less because in my home I use vinegar and baking
soda instead of harsh chemicals to clean, I don't use chlorinated dishwasher
detergent, my closets are not full of synthetic fabrics, my carpets do not emit
formaldehyde as most carpets do, I don't have particleboard furniture, and I eat
real food instead of heating up plastic container of convenience junk in my
microwave.
This particular example could have been in the brainpower tip, because it
shows how this acquaintance jumped to false conclusions and got indignant (and
abusive) with me as the answer to his own costly behavior. But I put it under
the finance tip because it's a prelude to the tip I will now share with you.
You save money by having good usage habits.
Consider:
- The SUV driver who lets his car idle while he runs into the store, and
who then gripes about the cost of fuel.
- The person who doesn't understand that the glass doors in store
refrigerators is actually transparent (they didn't get the memo, apparently)
and then complains about the price of eggs or whatever. Well, when you get
enough people wasting electricity at a store, the store has to increase
prices to pay for it.
- The person who opts for all the bells and whistles in a refrigerator or
other appliance, regardless of energy usage.
- People who dry their clothes on high heat. This wastes energy and also
destroys the fabric. It's a very expensive habit.
- People who stand with the outside door open to talk to someone who is
standing on their porch. Even when the air is running or the heat is
running. What I do is either go outside or invite the person in. If it's
really cold, I'm not going to stand there and freeze. If they decline to
come in, I say fine then we aren't going to talk.
- People who make special trips to the store, instead of keeping a running
list of what they need and making 25% as many trips. Even better when the
planners combine trips into a single "loop" to eliminate wasted miles going
in the same direction and back.
- People who eat out all the time, then buy "weight loss" products. This
is a double-whammy. Making your own wholesome meals is emotionally rewarding
and cheaper than eating out, plus you don't have to buy those diet pills.
The list could go on and on. The main point is that, for most people, excess
costs are due to poor choices they make. Those poor choices result from not
taking the time to think things through or to ask basic questions about the cost
of Choice X versus Choice Y.
I empathize with the SUV drivers who don't want to suffer in a hot vehicle.
But is leaving the car running with the AC on the way to solve that problem?
When a car engine idles, a larger portion of its fuel drops out of suspension
that when it's above idle. This fouls your plugs and contaminates your oil,
which means even less MPG. And it's just wasteful and polluting, I find it
socially irresponsible and immoral.
Maybe it's my imagination, but I believe that at least some cars are equipped
with functional windows? Mine is, at least. I get in a hot car and lower the
windows to create a cross-breeze. This instantly reduces the temperature. My
car, which must be an odd one, also has a vent control. When I first turn on the
AC, it has to push around a lot of hot air, but with the vent open it is pushing
much of that air outside and pulling in air that is cooler than the interior of
the vehicle. My advice to people whose cars are not equipped with these features
is to replace the car with one that is. And before going that route, check to
see whether your car actually has these features. Now, I was a bit tongue in
cheek here. All cars have these features. It's not particularly an intellectual
challenge to figure out how to use them. They greatly mediate the hot car
problem, and you can reduce it even further with things like window tinting and
removable folding shades. |
5. Security tip
This is from Bank of
America. Three scams to look out for:
-
INVESTMENT SCAMS
"They guaranteed a quick return."
There's no such thing.
Always research investment opportunities before sharing your
information.
-
SHOPPING DEALS
"It seemed like such a great deal."
Deals on social media may offer fake goods or be too good to be true.
Slow down, and research the seller before sharing information.
-
TECH SUPPORT SCAMS
"They needed access to 'fix' my computer."
Be cautious. Don't share security codes, passwords or account
information. We'll never contact you to ask for those.
These are on top of the
many other scams we face or have faced. Some, such as the C*O*V*I*D scam,
have had deadly consequences. How can you detect a scam? Look for the
manipulation factor, the emotional appeal. By channeling the proposal to
your amygdala, the scamster bypasses your cerebral cortex. This is why, for
example, we saw Mensa activity coordinators putting mask and "vaccine" codes
on their activities, a positively stupid thing you would not expect from
members of a group that calls itself "The High IQ Society". But the high IQs
did not come to bear on the question, because these people processed the
propaganda with the reptilian part of their brains not the high IQ part of
their brains.
The most commonly
manipulated emotions are fear and greed. Refuse to let those emotions be
manipulated, and you become nearly scam-proof. Some ways to do that:
-
Don't respond
immediately. Use the "sleep on it" technique.
-
Step back and reframe
the problem or proposal in objective terms. Does it even make sense?
What if you had to explain it to another person, using facts and logic?
-
Consider the source.
If the "information" comes from a zero credibility source such as the
New York Times or CDC, assume the opposite to be true and act
accordingly.
-
Compare it to what you
already know. For example, you get a call from a lender offering a 5%
loan. You know the current Prime Rate means you'd be lucky to find a
loan at 8%. Upon further investigation, you find out they mean 5% a
month. That's a 60% APR loan.
-
Consider the
surrounding circumstances. For example, you get a call from some call
center in India about solar for your home. Big red flag there. But the
guy goes on to say the installation is free. Another red flag, too good
to be true. But they take a percentage of your savings from the utility,
which sounds reasonable. But they don't know that your roof is in shade
for half the day and is too small for enough panels (which come in a
standard size the same way plywood does) to power your home because
yours is a two-story not a ranch. And so on.
|
6. Health tip/Fitness tips

 |
Statistics
when this photo was taken, 10 days before my 63rd birthday:
-
Height: 6'0"
-
Wingspan: 6'1"
-
Weight: 152.6 lbs, which is more than the 148.8lbs from the
2022 shoot. I am also leaner for this one (notice the striations in my left
pec).
-
Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says
is 5%
-
Waist: 29
-
Chest: 48
-
Arms: 15
-
Quads: 20.25
-
Max bench press: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 10 reps with 150 lbs
to warm up on chest day
-
Max squat: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 8 reps of front
squats with 90lbs to start Leg Day
-
Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side
-
Testosterone: Above the upper limit of the normal range
-
Last illness: 1971
-
Last workout missed: Spring of 1977
-
Training days per week: 6
-
Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
-
Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day
-
Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 7 and 10
-
Percent of diet that is processed food: 0
-
Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0
-
Number of clot shots received: 0.
*********
See
all of my climbing videos here:
https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel. Some cool climbing videos:
My hardest climb ever, a 5.11d on lead:
https://youtu.be/UT5h0heUUBc . I
made a dumb mistake initially, letting the rope wrap over my shoulder. Watch
what happens.
The scale:
- Beginner: 5.6. 5.7. 5.8, 5.9
- Intermediate: 5.10a, b, c, d 5.11a, b, c, d
- Advanced: 5.12a, b, c, d 5.13a, b, c, d. Almost nobody climbs at this
level at any of the 5 local climbing gyms.
|
|
During a break between exhausting climbs recently, my climbing buddies and I
had a short conversation during which I updated them on my feline companion.
I said adding Stevia to her food resulted in her doing the clean plate
thing. One of my buddies asked whether Stevia is safe. I said it was used in
the Andes for thousands of years to no ill effect. But there's been a lot of
bad press on it. The bad press came from the sugar industry, I opined. Then
I mentioned an article I read stating not to eat spinach or beets, because
of the oxalates. This was met with incredulity. I also noted I read another
article stating that broccoli can give you cancer due to its natural toxins.
See my Brainpower article above, noting the Hill's Science Diet scam. The
point of the preceding is that vast amounts of "health" information is
simply wrong. Not just the idiocy spewed by the CDC, the FDA, and
death-dealing corporations like Hill's Science Diet, but also idiocy and
semi-idiocy spewed by alternative press, bloggers, supplement sellers, and
promoters of various whacky diets.
Over the years, we've been bombarded with idiocies such as eggs are bad,
butter is bad, carbs are bad, fat is bad, and so on.
An example of word misuse
Recently, I read that honey is no better than table sugar because it's
mainly fructose. Is honey basically sugar? That depends on how you define
"honey". Two friends of mine from the electrical industry are beekeepers.
They have one definition of honey. It's the stuff you extract from the
honeycombs of bees that make it from natural food sources. It's not
homogenized, pasteurized, clarified, filtered, heated, "enhanced", or
adulterated in any way. It's so dark that you can't see through it. You do
not find this honey on the typical grocery store shelf.
Then there's the common definition, and it applies to a highly processed
product that has been stripped of its nutritional value down to the point
where just about all that's left is the fructose. And there's a newer
definition, and it refers to a substance that does not even come from bees.
It's high fructose corn syrup with "honey flavoring" (petrochemicals) and
artificial coloring.
What's wrong with real honey, from a physique-building standpoint, is it
is calorie-dense. This means if you want to enjoy a jar of honey, you need
to dole it out over time and time when you dole it out. I recently opened a
jar, and most mornings I drip a teaspoon of it over what I am eating for
breakfast. Sometimes at night, to help me sleep, I will dip a banana into
that jar and then eat it (sooooo delicious). I also compensate a bit for the
extra calories by slightly reducing certain other foods. For example, I have
smaller portions of rice. When a jar of honey is gone, my weight has not
budged from what it was the day I opened the jar. I don't get the insulin
rush or endocrine modification I would get from either of those fake honey
products.
How to sort fact from fiction
One thing I don't do is waste my time evaluating the various specious
claims for veracity. There are just too many. My approach is to understand
the principles and basic facts related to sound nutrition. Anything outside
of those, I know I can disregard. For example, the latest revision on "eggs
are bad for you" is it's OK to have up to one egg per day. I don't bother
evaluating such nonsense, because it's based on the ignorant idea that your
blood levels of cholesterol are dictated by the amount of cholesterol you
eat. It's a basic fact that cholesterol does not survive intact through the
stomach, and it's another basic fact that the cholesterol in your blood is
all produced by your liver.
Below are twelve basic facts and principles. How many more can you list?
Take a few minutes and see, you may surprise yourself!
- "If it's made by man, I don't eat it" -- Jack LaLanne.
- Eat whole foods, or ones only a few steps from whole. If it comes in
something that has a label, it is probably not good for you.
- "Old school" foods are good for you. These include the "old" fats
that you get from butter, olive oil, avocadoes, and eggs.
- "New school" foods are bad for you. These include low-fat yogurt
(the fat is replaced with an emulsifier, which is basically detergent),
oleo, and "lite" versions of anything.
- The more robust an oil tastes, the better it is for you.
- Flavorless oils (canola, safflower, etc.) should not be consumed by
humans, dogs, cats, or horses. Check the label on any canned or kibbled
foods.
- Your body can't process a lot of protein at once without overloading
your kidneys and without converting the excess protein to fat. So spread
your meals out to five or six per day.
- Always have a fair amount of protein as part of your breakfast.
- The three major grains (corn, wheat, soy) are frankengrains, so
don't eat them.
- Variety is not only "the spice of life", it's a key concept in meal
planning. Rotate new foods in and other food out, on a regular basis. If
you make a particular dish frequently, make a different variation almost
as frequently.
- A banana is the ultimate convenience food. Well, maybe an apple is.
- Organic foods are almost always a better choice.
|
|
|
At
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:- The best workouts are short and intense.
- A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction
than the typical American diet.
|
7. Factoid
Karl Marx was a Prussian political economist and journalist
in the mid to late 1800s, just after the industrial revolution gave us the
industrial age. In other words, he was a bullsh** artist who lived in an out of
touch theoretical world. This lack of a real-world basis for his theories
explains why socialism has failed badly every time it's been tried. The problems
Marx identified (exploitation of the workers) were already being solved by
economic necessity, labor unions, and an increasingly educated populace with
increasing options. Henry Ford gave things a boost when he insisted on paying
his workers a good wage; this caught on and any rationale for socialism became
moot. |
8. Thought for the Day
It was not innovators who exploited workers in Marx's
Prussia, a country where American ideas of freedom and democratic process did
not exist. It was the oligarchs who exploited the workers, same as the
"Democrats" do in America today on behalf of their employers (Big Pharma, Big
Agra, the Military Industrial Complex, etc.).
Please forward this eNL to others.
Authorship
The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!).
The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or
other brainwashed individuals. That's because those fools live in an alternate reality
and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works. They cannot do
basic math, cannot apply logic, and cannot be bothered to learn the basic facts
relevant to any topic that they are passionate about.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified.
Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter.
It is an act of service, almost no money is generated for me through this
effort. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others.
|