In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness |
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
|
|
Please forward this to others who might find
it useful. If you have a
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link:
https://www.mindconnection.com
|
|
Please help me get a wider audience. Simply post a link to this
newsletter in the comments of any article you read online:
https://www.mindconnection.com/library/enlarchives/2024/enl2024-03-17.htm
1. Good News: Where the Intel is Good
|
Censorship Alert I sent out a message similar to the one below
and got both encouragement and good advice. Thanks! For now, I will send the eNL
as is and let the censors block most recipients, but then follow up (or
precede) with just the link. I did test with the message I sent (no
censorship) and a "Funny Names" joke (again, no censorship). The issue is
entirely that the oligarchy doesn't like people to tell the truth because
that could hurt their ability to rob, manipulate, and hurt ordinary people.
/////
My mail server uses a standard anti-spam
program to filter out spam before e-mail is downloaded to my e-mail client
(Outlook). I go into the Control Panel periodically to see if anything good
got caught. On my most recent visit, I found multiple replies to this eNL in
there. I also get bounces when sending with the error message indicating
spam. Apparently, anything factual about Covid is spam. Any link to Twitter,
which now permits non-propanda, is also spam. If you lie and say President
Trump was an insurrectionist, that will be allowed. If you say Brainless was
not actually elected or that he is senile, that bit of truth-telling is
spam.
So far, the communists are not able to censor the archives. Please make a
note to check those (see link above) on the 15th (or whatever day works for
you) of each month. I will also make more of an effort to evade censorship
by providing less commentary about the chronic crime, or at least providing
it in a more cryptic way. It's a shame this is going on, but on the other
hand it confirms that we are hitting a nerve.
I'm also considering just e-mailing out the link. I don't like such
e-mails myself, I want the content in the e-mail itself. What do you think?
/////
Thank you for your continued readership and for passing this along to
others.
Fighting Communism
-
A new poll conducted by Howard University shows most people in Michigan
who call themselves black do not support Biden. In 2020, Biden had the
support of 94% of these people. Now they realize they've been lied to,
sold a bill of goods, and injured financially and socially by Bidenomics
and wokeism.
-
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled unanimously on 04MARCH to restore
Donald Trump's name on Republican Primary ballots. This overturned the
Colorado ruling, and reversed the decisions in Maine and Illinois. These
communist enclaves falsely claimed that Trump engaged in "insurrection"
and used that as their basis for such anti-democratic rulings.
Interestingly, SCOTUS sidestepped the "insurrection" claim altogether,
and instead cited Sections 3 and 5 of the Constitution.
The mere fact that these communist enclaves resort to such blatantly
illegal behavior based on blatantly false accusations does speak
volumes. The big message to the rest of us is the commies know they
cannot win in a fair and honest election. This big message simply
confirms the common sense observation that Trump won in 2020, except for
the massive, obvious, blatant cheating that went on with the "after the
polls closed" mail in votes that overturned the voting results, plus the
many other illegal actions done to overturn the results of real votes
being made by real people.
-
The Appeals Court in DC overturned one of the (many) bogus convictions
of the January 6 tourists (well, OK, there were some rioters also but
they were unarmed and basically just noisy). In this case, the bogus
charge was "obstruction of justice". This win helps create some momentum
as the various bogus cases make their way to the SCOTUS.
-
In this newsletter, I have explained various economic principles and
discussed how deleterious the socialist spendathons are to our economy
and to individual financial security. Brainless keeps flapping his lips
about how Bidenomics "is working" as if somehow debasing our currency,
increasing our tax burden, restricting our energy supply, and generally
hampering commerce have produced good benefits for the economy. But the
gullible live among us, and unfortunately they vote. A new website takes
on the Bidenomics narrative and lie machine, and it's updated
frequently. See it here:
www.bidenomics.com. Share that URL with as many people as you can.
We must not let this moron "win" this November. If it is common to
complain about his horrendous performance as POTUS, then the communists
would not dare fake an election this year. There was a hint of
plausibility the last time, because unfortunately Donald Trump
legitimized Biden in their "debate" by letting Biden rile him. Instead
of interrupting as if Biden should be taken seriously, Trump should have
comported himself as a confident, capable adult and just waited for his
turn to speak. Had he done that, he would be serving his second term in
office today. His behavior greenlighted the coup by making it almost
plausible that more people voted for Biden than for him (if you close
your eyes, cross your fingers, and fart three times then you can follow
the "logic" behind the claim that the "election" was an honest one). By
exposing Biden for the catastrophic failure that he is, we help remove
the plausibility factor (as weak as it is).
-
After George Floyd died in 2020 from a combination of heart disease and
an overdose of fentanyl, many corporations (including all of the large
banks) in the USA adopted DEI, which stands for Disrespect, Exclusion,
and Intolerance. All directed at police officers (of all races),
so-called "white" males, religious people (mostly Jews and Catholics),
and those who follow science instead of the fluid gender narrative. This
hasn't worked out so well. It turns out that police perform a highly
desirable function in our society, and the others on the list of "people
to hate" don't appreciate being abused that way. And policies based on
such abuse turn out to promote incompetence among workers and management
alike (look what happened to Bed Bath and Beyond).
Consequently, these large corporations are abandoning racism and blind
ideology in their hiring practices (it may have helped that some of
their attorneys actually read the 1964 Civil Rights Act). To avoid a
backlash from the racists and ideologues, they have been doing this
quietly and subtly. But they have been doing it. Now they are no longer
judging people by the color of their skin but by their character. Hmm.
Where did THAT idea come from?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP4iY1TtS3s See it at the 3 minute
mark.
-
While the "peaceful protests" (killing police, tossing firebombs into
occupied businesses, looting, etc.) that followed George Floyd's fatal
fentanyl overdose really were insurrection, the guided tours of the
Capitol on January 6 of the following year were not. One of the "facts"
the communists have used to help stick the terrorist label on these
tourists (and also the rioters outside) is "VP Kamala Harris was in the
building when it all went down". Recently released footage shows they
lied about that. This raises huge questions about their zealous
persecution of innocent people and it throws cold water on their various
charges against President Trump. Watch it here:
https://rumble.com/v4eqvt8-0113uscs01senatecarriagedoor-2021-01-06-11h20min02s737ms.mp4.html
The Ongoing Covid Scam: Tidbits
-
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1761148935572459745 Tucker
Carlson.
-
Barry Young, who released New Zealand's Covid-related data, was not
thanked by the pro-vax crowd. They want him in prison. If the vax is
"safe and effective", they would be pushing for all countries to release
the data to prove this. But no country has, so why do you think that is?
Multiple analyses of the New Zealand data show the more shots you get,
the more likely you are to die.
-
To get the clot shot in the UK, you must be over 65. The rationale
is there's no proven efficacy and there's about zero risk of dying from
Covid if you are under 70 and don't have a comorbidity. It looks like
THAT government actually cares about its citizens unlike the USA
government. Adding to that perception is the fact that England's
National Health Service has permanently banned puberty blockers for kids
(our own government actually protects the child abusers who promote this
and punishes the parents who try to protect their children from this
abuse).
-
You know those idiots who are still wearing masks to "protect"
themselves from Covid even though such protection is not even remotely
possible with such a mask? Except for the exceptionally porous cloth
ones, these masks emit significant amounts of microplastics into the
lungs of the wearer. Once washed, the emission is 2.5 times greater
[Source: Bhabha Atomic Research Center Mumbai, India -- Published in
"Environmental Science and Pollution Research"]. This hugely increases
the risk of pulmonary fibrosis.
Mask-wearing among those 18 to 25 is at a higher rate than for almost
any other demographic cohort for the same reason they aren't allowed to
rent a car (brain not fully developed). Unfortunately, this doesn't
clean the gene pool because they will have kids before dying (slowly and
in agony) from the pulmonary fibrosis.
So it turns out that Mr. Fauci was right after all. Masks DO work--if
your goal is to kill as many people as possible, they help take care of
those who survived the jab.
Other News
-
My buddy Charlie, who is incredibly smart, sent me this along with his
own comments so I feel compelled to share it:
https://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/why-electric-vehicle-sales-mandates
-
I'm sad to say that liberal (in the more traditional sense of the word)
Senator Kyrsten Sinema won't be seeking re-election for a second term
this November. From her announcement, we can see her main issue is she
doesn't get her jollies from anger, division, and hatred. Hmm. Defective
for a Democrat by today's "standards", which is why she went
independent. When your opponent is principled and at least listens to
you, you have to respect your opponent. I respect Senator Sinema and I
hope her successor will be equally deserving.
-
The legacy media are promoting the patently false idea that under
Biden's "double the debt" practices, attacks on the supply chain, and
heavy foot on the necks of small businesses, we have a "robust economy".
This is the worst economy since FDR. We don't have the stagflation of
the 1970s along with its high interest rates, but even in the 1970s
people could afford to buy homes, rent apartments, and buy things like
butter.
Today, we have frequent food shortages and business closures that were
unimaginable in the 1970s. Inflation is worse than it has been at any
time in our nation's history, and inflation has a corrosive effect on
many things besides the economy. Remember, I am talking about inflation
rather than a general increase in prices. Politicians and other liars
like to conflate the two, so as to pretend inflation is lower than it
is. Inflation is but one input to prices, albeit a fairly big one.
Inflation is a tax levied by diluting the value of existing money and
existing dollar-based assets, and it's levied by simply creating money
out of thin air faster than the growth of goods and services.
The reality is Biden has not achieved anything good for the American
people since the coup put him in office. His administration has been a
disaster on every key metric, especially the economy. His spinsters are
clinging to the "robust economy" lie because they can gin up numbers to
"prove" it to people who don't question what they are told, don't
understand economics, and are blind to what is going on around them.
Wealthy east coast liberals, for example.
-
It's now old news that SCOTUS restored Trump the the ballot in states
that removed him. What is important to understand is this was a
unanimous decision. It was a matter not of politics, but of
Constitutional Law. Just because you blindly follow a damaging ideology
and don't like someone because he is opposed to it does not mean you can
pass a law targeting that individual.
-
When President Trump announced he would run for a third time, I said it
was a bad idea. The communists do not want him in office. During his
second term, he wasn't even allowed in office despite winning the
election by a landslide. Now they will simply destroy him personally,
and they have half a year to do it. Whoever inherits Biden's mess cannot
possibly succeed because of that mess. A sensible strategy would have
been for Trump to stay silently in the background while letting another
Republican become POTUS. This is what Putin did, and it worked for him
(not the Republican part, but you get the idea).
Gerald Ford followed Nixon (VP Agnew was gone, then Nixon resigned, so
Speaker Ford became POTUS). Ford did a respectable job, but there was no
way for him to turn that mess around. Said mess was the huge debt from
the Vietnam War combined with the huge costs of LBJ's expensive social
programs (aka, "guns and butter"). Tricky Dick tried wage and price
controls (a socialist tactic, it cannot possibly work). Jimmy Carter
inherited the LBJ mess that his two predecessors could not clean up, so
he looked like a failure too.
It's not all about the POTUS. By electing a less polarizing figure in
2024 than either of these two, the nation could being the long,
agonizing journey to recovery from Biden's devastating "reign of error".
For POTUS we'd get a succession of one-termers, flipping from R to D to
R to D, but during this time many of the communists would get flushed
out of the House and Senate.
Instead, we will get either a second term stolen by Biden, et al, or a
third term earned by a severely harassed President Trump trying to make
the pile of sh** sandwiches left by Biden taste better. Trump's third
term would be a failure, thus allowing libtard rewriters of history to
vindicate the communist anti-Trump obsession that started when Comrade
Hillary was running against Trump for POTUS.
Americans did not ask for this "you lose either way" choice. It's what
we were given by a political system run by criminals. I have no idea how
to fix it. I think all we can do is watch the circus and try to get a
good laugh from it as we figure out how to survive the plundering and
insanity.
-
It may well be the Democrats who rescue America. A businessman and
entrepreneur, Jason Palmer, defeated Brainless on Super Tuesday. The
problem is Palmer is on the ballot in only 16 states. But you have to
remember that the Primaries are not binding. The Party can nominate
anyone it wants. A case in point is Brainless was a distant fourth and
Cackling Kamala was dead last, and yet these two fools got nominated. A
third Trump win would be contentious for the next four years, just as
the previous two Trump wins were (and on the second one, they simply
disregarded the election results with millions of fake mail-in ballots
submitted after the polls closed).
Palmer could fix a lot of the damage, setting things in motion for an
unpolarized election in 2028. It could be a situation much like the
Clinton years, where the Democrat POTUS works a Republican Congress to
fix the economic problems. In that case, the family who owns the debt
clock actually took it down. The Vietnam War debt that haunted us under
LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Bush was finally reigned in. I'm not
saying the Clinton years were all roses (look at the criminal safety aka
gun ban insanity, for example), but they were certainly good for the
economy because a lot of financial waste was eliminated. For example,
Clinton had the Navy get rid of outdated surface ships such as the WWII
era Mullinax class destroyers that cost a lot to operate but could not
be used in modern warfare. He took a lot of heat for that, but stood his
ground.
-
It would be nice if both President Trump and pseudo-President Brainless
both withdrew. While Trump proved himself to be a capable executive, the
communists just will not let him govern. But what about Brainless?
Cackling Kamala is clearly not a viable choice, but Big Mike, aka
Michael Robinson, aka "Michelle" Obama is. If the communists /
"Democrats" put him on the ticket after the "surprise" news that
Brainless is too far gone to be POTUS, what would happen?
Mike would have the backing of the very vocal and influential "trans"
community, a voting bloc that now has some power. He would also be
endorsed by people who believe that if you are "black" then you are
required to avoid thinking for yourself at all costs. But would "black"
people en masse vote for him? I think not. First, there's the fact that
the Arab pretending to be black Obama used his eight years in office to
set black people back a few decades. His economic policies were
especially brutal on blacks. Second, blacks in general tend to be very
religious or at least the majority of people who call themselves black
are very religious. They idea of a cross-dresser or trans for President
is something they will find repugnant. There's more to this, of course,
but those factors would loom large.
I think Governor Kelly of Kansas would be a good choice for the Democrat
nomination, but her fatal flaw in their eyes is she is a rational person
and does a good job serving her constituency. This flies in the face of
the current dogma, which is to be utterly insane while damaging the
constituency in as man ways as you can get by with. And as already
mentioned, Palmer would not be a bad choice.
I think the Republicans have several good choices, almost none of whom
were on the primary ballot. Why were those people not there? Because
they are smart, and they realized it would be The Donald Trump Show
instead of an actual primary. So why spend time and money on it? Ron
DeSantis was a good choice, but when you have a good state governor like
that you keep him there as governor. He gets to build political capital
for later, and his state reaps the benefits in the meantime.
-
Brainless is continuing his "black people must be morons" strategy.
After insulting and violating values deeply had by the majority of
"black people" and inflicting runaway inflation, joblessness, food
shortages, etc. on people of all colors, he's still asserting that he
supports "black people" and says "I have your back". He has their butt,
not their back. I hope this truth continues to be realized by more and
more people who call themselves black. The racism and condescension by
Brainless might be tolerable, but the social and economic attacks by him
are far more damaging that mere disrespect and should not be tolerated.
-
I started subscribing to the Nutcase Newsletter years before Nutcase
Nancy ended her stint as Speaker of the House. In her March edition, she
had comments about Brainless Biden's budget. Not that it's insane and
unaffordable, but that it includes millions of dollars of pork barrel
spending for San Francisco alone. And of course, she and her supporters
think this kind of illegal wealth transfer is just wonderful.
-
The Tibetans chose Tenzin Gyatso as their Dalai Lama (leader) while he
was still a child. When the communists invaded, he fled to India where
he now lives in exile. The communists ignored the will of the people and
appointed their own fake Dalai Lama in his place.
In the USA, the American People chose Donald Trump as our POTUS
(leader). During his first term, he did a very good job (based on
metrics that matter to ordinary people) even though he often behaved
childishly. Then the communists, who had already invaded, used mail-in
ballot abuse and other attacks on the election system to ignore the will
of the people and install their own fake leader in his place.
We did not adequately stand up against the communists either time. This
November, we will have what may be our last chance to ever stand up to
them again. We need to win. Contact your county election board and ask
what they are doing about election integrity. It's not a matter of
convincing people to vote against Brainless (or Big Mike, depending on
how things develop), because the vast majority of Americans can see how
profoundly more awful life as become under communist rule. It's a matter
of giving us our voice in choosing communism or Constitutionality. For
many, it's a choice between communism and survival.
|
2. Product Highlight
The Rocket Pen is a life-changer for students and adults with reading
difficulties. Scan words or lines from any screen (e.g., tablet, smart phone,
computer) or printed material, and it not only reads to you but provides word
definitions, word breakdown, and more to teach you to read (by "you" we mean the
person you buy this for). The Rocket Pen Reader gives the reading-challenged
their independence.
Buy the Rocket Pen on Amazon
| eBay |
Walmart
Watch this demo video:
https://youtu.be/DQd4MBpv4B8
These features were added with the latest release:
- Has dictionary lockout and ExamRead feature, so it doubles as an exam
pen.
- Left-hand user mode.
- Scan left to right mode.
- Fast shutdown.
- Selectable voices for playback of scanned text.
- Selectable UI language: English (default) or Spanish.
- Includes both English and Spanish dictionaries.
Other features and benefits:
- Allows students or adults with reading difficulties to gain independence
and reading fluency without stigma.
- Reading tutor functions include spelling, syllabication (how the word is
"built"), and one word displayed in big font.
- Syllables break for each word.
- Direct lookup of phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions (for example,
get ahead, get along, keep on, keep off, look forward to).
- Uses colors for the different fields, to improve the understanding of
the dictionary definition.
- You scan, it reads to you.
- Scans lines of text or individual words from almost any surface, not
just paper. It can read the text on a computer, tablet, or phone.
- Hear individual words or even multiple lines of text read aloud in natural voice.
- Completely self-contained, no computer or Wi-Fi required.
- Comes ready to use, no setup process (but customization can easily be
done).
- Full 1.9 inch color touch screen, and simple physical buttons for
screenless scan and read.
- Multiple built-in dictionaries to search definitions including the New
Oxford American Dictionary (over twice the size of what the cPen uses) with Oxford Thesaurus of English (Americanized),
Oxford American Children’s Dictionary with Oxford American Children’s
Thesaurus, and English to Spanish dictionary.
- Built-in speaker automatically mutes when earbuds are used,
automatically unmutes when they aren't.
- Meets FCC, ROHS, and CE standards.
- Package includes ReaderPen, USB charging cable, Quick Start Guide, and
earphones.
|
 |
The Rocket Pen Reader is an affordable, powerful reading assistant and reading
tutor that erases the barriers created by dyslexia and other reading problems.
It can be used privately in the classroom, avoiding stigma, thanks to the
earbuds included in the kit (it can alternatively be used without earbuds).
How it teaches reading
Before the early 1980s, public schools relied on phonics to teach reading.
This allowed any student to "sound out" a new, unfamiliar word and also
recognize its root and thereby often grasp its meaning even without a
dictionary. Then schools switched to the "Look See" method, which treated words
as individual pictograms to memorize. The results were dismal, plummeting the
USA from the top of the literacy ranks to the bottom among industrialized
countries.
The Rocket Pen puts phonics back in.
It also adds a context-driven dictionary and a context-driven thesaurus, both
powerful tools for improving reading skills. See the reading tutor functions in
the chart below.
It is the answer
The Rocket Pen Reader is the answer for helping the reading-challenged in the
classroom, special needs classes, home-schooling, and adult education. Because
of its mobile-friendly design, you can carry it with you and use it anywhere.
Not only does it read to you, it helps you learn to read (for example, by
showing you the syllable breakdown and the definition). It is super easy to use,
no need to watch a dozen videos to figure out what to do.
Based on the highly
successful ReadingPen 2 and vastly superior to the cPen Reader Pen, the
RocketPen is the latest generation in a reading tutor scanning pen. It is a
quantum leap or two beyond anything else on the market. This amazing device
retails for $499, sells for $399 on Amazon and Walmart.com, but is on sale
now for a limited time only via our eBay store at only $379!
It beats the competition
Compare the Rocket Pen to the competition. The winner here is obvious:
|
Rocket Pen |
cPen Reader |
OrCam Read |
Amazon Price |
399 |
285 |
1990 |
Color touchscreen |
Yes |
No |
No |
Words appear in large font |
Yes |
No |
No |
Scans phones, tablets, etc. |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Scans blocks of text |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Color-coded dictionary |
Yes |
No |
No |
Simple physical buttons |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Ergonomic for kids |
Yes |
No |
No |
English and Spanish |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Verbal commands |
No |
No |
Yes |
Auto trigger upon contact |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Easy menu navigation |
Yes |
No |
No |
Manufacturer experience, yrs |
30 |
8 |
5 |
Product age |
Latest generation! |
8 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Reading Tutor Functions |
|
|
|
Dictionary 1 |
New Oxford American (large) |
Oxford Primary (small) |
n/a |
Dictionary 2 |
Oxford American Children’s |
n/a |
n/a |
Thesaurus 1 |
New Oxford American |
Oxford Primary |
n/a |
Thesaurus 2 |
Oxford American Children’s |
n/a |
n/a |
Syllablication / word breakdown |
Yes |
No |
No |
Hear word spelled out |
Yes |
No |
No |
See word spelled out |
Yes |
No |
No |
Part of speech |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Color coding in dictionary |
Yes |
No |
No |
Headword |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Pronunciation guide |
Yes |
No |
No |
Idioms |
Yes |
No |
No |
Quick Define feature |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
3. Brainpower tip
My first experience with e-mail was as a Systems Engineer for Bailey Controls,
starting in 1989. We had the Banyan Vines network that allowed individual
engineering work stations (the 80386 computers we used) to communicate with each
other. We could send drawings and messages to each other. I found this totally
amazing. We used to joke about somehow doing this in our personal lives, but who
would run a Banyan Vines network for individuals? We concluded that some day,
there would be e-mail for the masses because this was just so useful. It would
have to be something other than an office network. Then along came AOL. And we
had mail! The content idea was patterned after sending paper letters. So early
on, people composed those letters electronically. When received, e-mails were
read with the same diligence and attention that paper letters were. That was on
the typical 14 inch monitor of the time.
AOL also had Instant Messenger, kind of the equivalent of text messaging.
Most people hated it, because it interrupted what you were doing to provide you
with a very short message and the shortness made it not very useful.
When texting became mobile, it also became useful. Now you could send a short
message that someone could easily read even though they had a tiny screen. This
was great for things like, "On my way" or "Call me". It was not great for
anything substantive.
At about the same time, the ability to get mail on your phone was provided.
Gmail was integral to Android phones. You could have your mail server forward
messages to your phone so you could at least see if anything urgent came in. No
more lugging a laptop around to check e-mail while away from the office.
But then a twist came. Many people began relying on their phone-based e-mail
all the time. After more than a few lines, e-mails become an eye-glazing
experience. And that's because, due to its tiny screen, a phone works great for
those (short) text messages but cannot properly display anything much beyond
those.
I can now tell if a person is receiving my e-mails on their phone, because
their reply indicates they didn't actually read the e-mail. They glanced through
it, picking something out of context and assuming that's the gist. Usually, they
miss everything important in that message. They end up looking stupid. Not only
is GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) true, but so is NINO (nothing in, nothing
out).
Use e-mail on a PC instead of a phone, and encourage your correspondents to
do the same. It's a lot easier to read a detailed message on a 24 inch screen
than on a 4 inch screen. And you won't end up looking stupid due to catching
only part of the message. |
4. Finance tip
While working on my 1040 tax filing this year, something dawned on me as I went
through the interview process with the H&R Block software. Medical insurance
payments are 100% deductible, but medical expenses are not.
On the latter, the rule is something like the amount you can deduct has to be
the excess of $7500 that is 7.5% of your income (less the standard deduction).
To make the example easy to follow, let's say it's 10%. So let’s say after the
standard deduction your income is $60K, which means you can deduct medical
expenses only after they exceed $7,500 + $4,500 = $12,000. If you had $13525 in
medical expenses, you could deduct $1525. This will reduce your tax bill by
$183, which is chump change compared to your monthly premiums.
Why is the tax code this way? It's done so that when people talk to an insurance
agent, a huge selling point is the tax deductibility. So they can make it seem
as if a high-cost, low-deductible insurance policy is the way to go because of
the tax break. What they leave out is tax deductions really don't net you that
much. Remember, the "tax rate" is the marginal rate. We have a bracketed system.
People who are in the 30% or whatever bracket are paying that on only a portion
of their income; overall, they probably pay closer to 12%. Which means they get
12 cents on the dollar. Being able to deduct an additional $3,000 of insurance
premiums saves you only $360 on your taxes. You actually lose $2,640.
Unless you live the disease lifestyle, you are better off with a very lean
medical insurance coverage (high deductibles) and then when you seek minor
medical care do that as an uninsured person. Treat medical insurance as
insurance not as a prepay plan. The idea is to protect your financial security
against large losses. As an example, I had a bump on my abdomen. I was pretty
sure it was a lipoma, but I needed diagnostics to confirm. I didn't have a
primary care physician, so signed up with a regional medical care system as an
uninsured patient. That status got me everything at about half price, which
means instead of paying about $500 out of pocket for insurance deductibles (on
top of the monthly premiums), I paid about $250. I can't deduct the $250 on my
taxes and get the $30 in tax savings I'm "entitled to". But I came out $220
ahead by not doing that. Even if you had Obamacare with 100% reimbursement of
the premiums, you are better off going as "uninsured" for things like this
(just go as "uninsured" when it works out better than being "insured").
When you apply real math in place of the funny math done by the insurance lobby,
you find that tax deductions should not enter into any consideration of how much
insurance to carry. Though you can't deduct the out of pocket medical expenses,
they cost far less than your tax-deductible insurance premiums especially when
you consider those come with their own deductibles before coverage kicks in.
Determine your insurance needs based on what your risks are and what you can
afford to pay for as an uninsured. Don't allow tax deductibility to enter into
the decision, due to the reasons stated.
You want to reduce your risks as much as is practical for you. But remember, you
cannot eliminate risk 100%. I have an excellent homeowner's policy, it covers a
lot and is affordable. I theoretically could skip it since the only thing likely
to destroy my home is a fire and I have reduced fire risk to nearly zero. But
"nearly" means it still could happen. To me, being "ripped off" by my insurer is
a pleasure. I have even joked with my agent about this, stating I desire to
never get my money's worth. He agrees. A problem with medical insurance is many
people expect to get their "money's worth", so they opt for excess coverage and
low deductibles. They really are being ripped off, and that's the point I am
trying to make.
|
5. Security tip
6. Health tip/Fitness tips

 |
Statistics
when this photo was taken, 10 days before my 63rd birthday:
-
Height: 6'0"
-
Wingspan: 6'1"
-
Weight: 152.6 lbs, which is more than the 148.8lbs from the
2022 shoot. I am also leaner for this one (notice the striations in my left
pec).
-
Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says
is 5%
-
Waist: 29
-
Chest: 48
-
Arms: 15
-
Quads: 20.25
-
Max bench press: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 10 reps with 150 lbs
to warm up on chest day
-
Max squat: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 8 reps of front
squats with 90lbs to start Leg Day
-
Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side
-
Testosterone: Above the upper limit of the normal range
-
Last illness: 1971
-
Last workout missed: Spring of 1977
-
Training days per week: 6
-
Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
-
Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day
-
Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 7 and 10
-
Percent of diet that is processed food: 0
-
Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0
-
Number of clot shots received: 0.
*********
See
all of my climbing videos here:
https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel. Some cool climbing videos:
My hardest climb ever, a 5.11d on lead:
https://youtu.be/UT5h0heUUBc . I
made a dumb mistake initially, letting the rope wrap over my shoulder. Watch
what happens.
The scale:
- Beginner: 5.6. 5.7. 5.8, 5.9
- Intermediate: 5.10a, b, c, d 5.11a, b, c, d
- Advanced: 5.12a, b, c, d 5.13a, b, c, d. Almost nobody climbs at this
level at any of the 5 local climbing gyms.
|
|
This is the time of year when people try to shed the holiday season fat and
get in shape for summer. Unfortunately, the time left for losing the fat
usually isn't sufficient for the amount of fat they desire to lose if the
approach is gradual. So they are looking for something fairly radical.
Last year, intermittent fasting was all the rage. It seems to be retaining
that status this year. There are two types:
- Day long or longer. You pick one day a period (week, 10 days, month)
in which you either do not eat at all or eat only a very small meal
before bed (so you aren't awake from hunger pains). Over the period this
cuts your calories to 1/X, with X being the length of the period. So for
10 days, you'd reduce total calories by 10%. Do it every other day, and
you get a 50% reduction in calories.
- Hours long. The idea here is you shrink the available hours in which
you can eat. So instead of your first meal at (say) 0600 and your last
one at (say) 2030, you eat your first meal at (say) 1200 and your last
meal at (say) 1800. But your meal sizes stay the same, you are just
skipping the ones that fall outside this window and thus you eat less.
Instead of 14.5 hours in which to eat, you have only 8. A typical plan
gives you a 40% calorie reduction every day.
These can, and often do, produce significant and rapid fat loss because
they produce significant calorie deficits. Variation One automatically
cycles you on and off the calorie deficit so that you don't get stuck in
starvation mode. Variation Two sticks you into starvation mode, unless you
cycle on and off it (for example, do it for two days per week).
Both of these have several problems and downsides, as does any diet that
shocks your body. These include erratic bowel behavior, massive energy
crashes, lack of mental focus (although a euphoric effect might make it seem
the opposite), loss of lean mass, and an escalation of stress hormones.
Instead of panicking yourself into one of these severe diets, I suggest
the following.
- Since you were comfortable enough with your body to gorge over the
holidays, be comfortable enough with it now to accept that going to the
opposite extreme isn't necessary. You'll just have to go this summer
looking like you should have eaten less this winter.
- Think about the previous thought again. Don't worry about what
others think, you don't have to be perfect this summer. Focus on getting
your lifestyle into alignment with your fitness/fatness/appearance goals
and let things happen over time. Set your eyes on NEXT summer.
You can accelerate a bit
But what if you want at least some faster improvement beyond what a
consistent diet and training program will eventually get you to? The good
news is there are some things you can do that don't cause stress hormone
release or those other problems and that will get you faster progress. But
again ask yourself just how important this is before you go there. Here are
some of those things:
- Try intermittent calorie reduction. Not fasting, but using a similar
principle. For example, if you always have a handful of nuts (very
healthy to do) late each afternoon, go one month eating them only on
even numbered days. This could bounce your caloric intake below the loss
line (fewer calories in than out) for a day, but you don't go into
starvation mode because the next day you are at or above the line again.
You can do this with any food. Just pick something to eat only on
alternate days. Maybe you like to have one protein shake in the morning
and one in the afternoon; skip the afternoon one on even numbered days.
- Try total calorie reduction by whole food serving downsizing. When
you buy bananas, apples, pears, sweet potatoes, etc., pick the smaller
ones of those that are available. This won't save you a huge amount of
calories, but you will have a reduced caloric intake that can be
combined for effect with the strategy above.
- Try intermittent meal downsizing. I meal prep, so all of my meals
are planned. The size doesn't vary unless I make less at the prep stage.
I prep most of these into glass bowls that I store in the refrigerator.
What you can do once a week is take half a prepped meal out of its bowl
to eat and leave the rest in there for the same meal the next day or the
day after.
These three tactics avoid going into starvation mode. You don't feel
deprived, don't get cravings, don't get bowel problems, and don't experience
energy crashes. You may experience an hour or two of hunger in any given
day, just drink water or tea to stave that off. You can also use
supplements:
- Green coffee bean extract. It does contain caffeine, so use it only
in the first half of the day.
- L-carnitine. It shifts the body into fat burning. Because it's not a
stimulant, it has long been called "the night time fat burner". Take
this in the afternoon. Take some before bed, but don't overdo it. The
more you go beyond the recommended dosage, the greater your risk of
severe calf cramps.
And you can try not using certain supplements. For example, many
people use a protein powder when their diet already provides more
protein than they need. The body cannot store protein, so it's broken
down to be stored as fat with some of the breakdown process leftover
being uric acid that the kidneys have to deal with. If you have a bottle
after bottle of supplements, remember that the capsules have calories.
Not a lot per capsule, but they do add up.
Know when to stop
If you find yourself lagging in energy, as in your workouts are lame
or you can't concentrate at work, stop with the calorie restriction.
Lame workouts mean you do not get the adaptive response, in which case
your testosterone will not become elevated and you will tend toward more
fat and less muscle. If you can't concentrate at work, you put your job
at risk and that's never a good idea. Always keep in mind that unless
your livelihood depends on having an extremely lean physique, there's no
reason for you to go to extremes to get extremely lean. You can achieve
that naturally over time, or you can naturally over time just maintain a
body fat level that you are comfortable with and that puts you in the
"healthy range" (this is a max of 8% body fat for men, something like
twice that for women). If your body looks a little soft or even pudgy,
will your family or your real friends love you any less? Of course not.
So don't worry about how people you don't even know will judge you. Most
of them are too busy worrying about their own perceived imperfections
that they think other people are judging them on. My personal goals
are different from what I have just discussed, but I have been at this
for many decades and it's a thing for me. Even so, I do not resort to
the extreme measures that are so common. I have had a few years in which
I have not done a photoshoot because I was too fat. That's because I
wasn't as disciplined in the cold months as I should have been to
prepare for it and there was no way I would be lean enough without going
on some crazy fat loss plan. I don't do the photoshoots to document how
badly I can treat my body, I do them to document how well I treat my
body. In those years I was too fat, I still went shirtless outside and
got plenty of sunlight. So what if I wasn't lean enough for physique
photos? Not the end of the world. |
|
|
At
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:- The best workouts are short and intense.
- A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction
than the typical American diet.
|
7. Factoid
The United States is not a democracy, and let's hope it never will be. It is a
democratic republic. What that means is the people elect representatives (city
council, county board, state rep, state senator, federal rep, federal senators)
who then deliberate to pass laws and the people elect specific executives
(mayor, commissioner, sheriff, governor, President) to be in charge of executing
them. While Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and other racist pigs would like a
democracy, it is a very undesirable form of government. A commonly cited example
is ten people gathered around a tree to vote on whether to hang one of them by a
rope and that one is the only black person among them. In a democracy, the
emotions of the moment rule and those emotions are seldom, if ever, based on
rational analysis. A democratic republic has the rule of law (follow the laws,
everyone is equal before the law) while in a Democracy it is really rule by
intimidation, gaslighting, lying, and bullying. |
8. Thought for the Day
When people use fear and intimidation to get you to accept
their viewpoint, there is almost no chance their viewpoint is correct. Else,
they'd argue on its merits.
Please forward this eNL to others.
Authorship
The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!).
The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or
other brainwashed individuals. That's because those fools live in an alternate reality
and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works. They cannot do
basic math, cannot apply logic, and cannot be bothered to learn the basic facts
relevant to any topic that they are passionate about.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified.
Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter.
It is an act of service, almost no money is generated for me through this
effort. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others.
|