Subscriptions
Past issues | Archives

Mindconnection eNL, 2024-03-17

Home

In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness | Factoid | Thought 4 the Day

Please forward this to others who might find it useful. If you have a social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link: https://www.mindconnection.com
 

Please help me get a wider audience. Simply post a link to this newsletter in the comments of any article you read online: https://www.mindconnection.com/library/enlarchives/2024/enl2024-03-17.htm

1. Good News: Where the Intel is Good

 

Censorship Alert

I sent out a message similar to the one below and got both encouragement and good advice. Thanks! For now, I will send the eNL as is and let the censors block most recipients, but then follow up (or precede) with just the link. I did test with the message I sent (no censorship) and a "Funny Names" joke (again, no censorship). The issue is entirely that the oligarchy doesn't like people to tell the truth because that could hurt their ability to rob, manipulate, and hurt ordinary people.

/////

My mail server uses a standard anti-spam program to filter out spam before e-mail is downloaded to my e-mail client (Outlook). I go into the Control Panel periodically to see if anything good got caught. On my most recent visit, I found multiple replies to this eNL in there. I also get bounces when sending with the error message indicating spam. Apparently, anything factual about Covid is spam. Any link to Twitter, which now permits non-propanda, is also spam. If you lie and say President Trump was an insurrectionist, that will be allowed. If you say Brainless was not actually elected or that he is senile, that bit of truth-telling is spam.

So far, the communists are not able to censor the archives. Please make a note to check those (see link above) on the 15th (or whatever day works for you) of each month. I will also make more of an effort to evade censorship by providing less commentary about the chronic crime, or at least providing it in a more cryptic way. It's a shame this is going on, but on the other hand it confirms that we are hitting a nerve.

I'm also considering just e-mailing out the link. I don't like such e-mails myself, I want the content in the e-mail itself. What do you think?

/////

Thank you for your continued readership and for passing this along to others.

Fighting Communism

  1. A new poll conducted by Howard University shows most people in Michigan who call themselves black do not support Biden. In 2020, Biden had the support of 94% of these people. Now they realize they've been lied to, sold a bill of goods, and injured financially and socially by Bidenomics and wokeism.
     
  2. The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled unanimously on 04MARCH to restore Donald Trump's name on Republican Primary ballots. This overturned the Colorado ruling, and reversed the decisions in Maine and Illinois. These communist enclaves falsely claimed that Trump engaged in "insurrection" and used that as their basis for such anti-democratic rulings. Interestingly, SCOTUS sidestepped the "insurrection" claim altogether, and instead cited Sections 3 and 5 of the Constitution.

    The mere fact that these communist enclaves resort to such blatantly illegal behavior based on blatantly false accusations does speak volumes. The big message to the rest of us is the commies know they cannot win in a fair and honest election. This big message simply confirms the common sense observation that Trump won in 2020, except for the massive, obvious, blatant cheating that went on with the "after the polls closed" mail in votes that overturned the voting results, plus the many other illegal actions done to overturn the results of real votes being made by real people.
     
  3. The Appeals Court in DC overturned one of the (many) bogus convictions of the January 6 tourists (well, OK, there were some rioters also but they were unarmed and basically just noisy). In this case, the bogus charge was "obstruction of justice". This win helps create some momentum as the various bogus cases make their way to the SCOTUS.
     
  4. In this newsletter, I have explained various economic principles and discussed how deleterious the socialist spendathons are to our economy and to individual financial security. Brainless keeps flapping his lips about how Bidenomics "is working" as if somehow debasing our currency, increasing our tax burden, restricting our energy supply, and generally hampering commerce have produced good benefits for the economy. But the gullible live among us, and unfortunately they vote. A new website takes on the Bidenomics narrative and lie machine, and it's updated frequently. See it here: www.bidenomics.com. Share that URL with as many people as you can.

    We must not let this moron "win" this November. If it is common to complain about his horrendous performance as POTUS, then the communists would not dare fake an election this year. There was a hint of plausibility the last time, because unfortunately Donald Trump legitimized Biden in their "debate" by letting Biden rile him. Instead of interrupting as if Biden should be taken seriously, Trump should have comported himself as a confident, capable adult and just waited for his turn to speak. Had he done that, he would be serving his second term in office today. His behavior greenlighted the coup by making it almost plausible that more people voted for Biden than for him (if you close your eyes, cross your fingers, and fart three times then you can follow the "logic" behind the claim that the "election" was an honest one). By exposing Biden for the catastrophic failure that he is, we help remove the plausibility factor (as weak as it is).
     
  5. After George Floyd died in 2020 from a combination of heart disease and an overdose of fentanyl, many corporations (including all of the large banks) in the USA adopted DEI, which stands for Disrespect, Exclusion, and Intolerance. All directed at police officers (of all races), so-called "white" males, religious people (mostly Jews and Catholics), and those who follow science instead of the fluid gender narrative. This hasn't worked out so well. It turns out that police perform a highly desirable function in our society, and the others on the list of "people to hate" don't appreciate being abused that way. And policies based on such abuse turn out to promote incompetence among workers and management alike (look what happened to Bed Bath and Beyond).

    Consequently, these large corporations are abandoning racism and blind ideology in their hiring practices (it may have helped that some of their attorneys actually read the 1964 Civil Rights Act). To avoid a backlash from the racists and ideologues, they have been doing this quietly and subtly. But they have been doing it. Now they are no longer judging people by the color of their skin but by their character. Hmm. Where did THAT idea come from? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP4iY1TtS3s See it at the 3 minute mark.
     
  6. While the "peaceful protests" (killing police, tossing firebombs into occupied businesses, looting, etc.) that followed George Floyd's fatal fentanyl overdose really were insurrection, the guided tours of the Capitol on January 6 of the following year were not. One of the "facts" the communists have used to help stick the terrorist label on these tourists (and also the rioters outside) is "VP Kamala Harris was in the building when it all went down". Recently released footage shows they lied about that. This raises huge questions about their zealous persecution of innocent people and it throws cold water on their various charges against President Trump. Watch it here: https://rumble.com/v4eqvt8-0113uscs01senatecarriagedoor-2021-01-06-11h20min02s737ms.mp4.html

The Ongoing Covid Scam: Tidbits

  1. https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1761148935572459745 Tucker Carlson.
     
  2. Barry Young, who released New Zealand's Covid-related data, was not thanked by the pro-vax crowd. They want him in prison. If the vax is "safe and effective", they would be pushing for all countries to release the data to prove this. But no country has, so why do you think that is? Multiple analyses of the New Zealand data show the more shots you get, the more likely you are to die.
     
  3. To get the clot shot in the UK, you  must be over 65. The rationale is there's no proven efficacy and there's about zero risk of dying from Covid if you are under 70 and don't have a comorbidity. It looks like THAT government actually cares about its citizens unlike the USA government. Adding to that perception is the fact that England's National Health Service has permanently banned puberty blockers for kids (our own government actually protects the child abusers who promote this and punishes the parents who try to protect their children from this abuse).
     
  4. You know those idiots who are still wearing masks to "protect" themselves from Covid even though such protection is not even remotely possible with such a mask? Except for the exceptionally porous cloth ones, these masks emit significant amounts of microplastics into the lungs of the wearer. Once washed, the emission is 2.5 times greater [Source: Bhabha Atomic Research Center Mumbai, India -- Published in "Environmental Science and Pollution Research"]. This hugely increases the risk of pulmonary fibrosis.

    Mask-wearing among those 18 to 25 is at a higher rate than for almost any other demographic cohort for the same reason they aren't allowed to rent a car (brain not fully developed). Unfortunately, this doesn't clean the gene pool because they will have kids before dying (slowly and in agony) from the pulmonary fibrosis.

    So it turns out that Mr. Fauci was right after all. Masks DO work--if your goal is to kill as many people as possible, they help take care of those who survived the jab.

Other News

  1. My buddy Charlie, who is incredibly smart, sent me this along with his own comments so I feel compelled to share it: https://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/why-electric-vehicle-sales-mandates
     
  2. I'm sad to say that liberal (in the more traditional sense of the word) Senator Kyrsten Sinema won't be seeking re-election for a second term this November. From her announcement, we can see her main issue is she doesn't get her jollies from anger, division, and hatred. Hmm. Defective for a Democrat by today's "standards", which is why she went independent. When your opponent is principled and at least listens to you, you have to respect your opponent. I respect Senator Sinema and I hope her successor will be equally deserving.
     
  3. The legacy media are promoting the patently false idea that under Biden's "double the debt" practices, attacks on the supply chain, and heavy foot on the necks of small businesses, we have a "robust economy". This is the worst economy since FDR. We don't have the stagflation of the 1970s along with its high interest rates, but even in the 1970s people could afford to buy homes, rent apartments, and buy things like butter.

    Today, we have frequent food shortages and business closures that were unimaginable in the 1970s. Inflation is worse than it has been at any time in our nation's history, and inflation has a corrosive effect on many things besides the economy. Remember, I am talking about inflation rather than a general increase in prices. Politicians and other liars like to conflate the two, so as to pretend inflation is lower than it is. Inflation is but one input to prices, albeit a fairly big one. Inflation is a tax levied by diluting the value of existing money and existing dollar-based assets, and it's levied by simply creating money out of thin air faster than the growth of goods and services.

    The reality is Biden has not achieved anything good for the American people since the coup put him in office. His administration has been a disaster on every key metric, especially the economy. His spinsters are clinging to the "robust economy" lie because they can gin up numbers to "prove" it to people who don't question what they are told, don't understand economics, and are blind to what is going on around them. Wealthy east coast liberals, for example.
     
  4. It's now old news that SCOTUS restored Trump the the ballot in states that removed him. What is important to understand is this was a unanimous decision. It was a matter not of politics, but of Constitutional Law. Just because you blindly follow a damaging ideology and don't like someone because he is opposed to it does not mean you can pass a law targeting that individual.
     
  5. When President Trump announced he would run for a third time, I said it was a bad idea. The communists do not want him in office. During his second term, he wasn't even allowed in office despite winning the election by a landslide. Now they will simply destroy him personally, and they have half a year to do it. Whoever inherits Biden's mess cannot possibly succeed because of that mess. A sensible strategy would have been for Trump to stay silently in the background while letting another Republican become POTUS. This is what Putin did, and it worked for him (not the Republican part, but you get the idea).

    Gerald Ford followed Nixon (VP Agnew was gone, then Nixon resigned, so Speaker Ford became POTUS). Ford did a respectable job, but there was no way for him to turn that mess around. Said mess was the huge debt from the Vietnam War combined with the huge costs of LBJ's expensive social programs (aka, "guns and butter"). Tricky Dick tried wage and price controls (a socialist tactic, it cannot possibly work). Jimmy Carter inherited the LBJ mess that his two predecessors could not clean up, so he looked like a failure too.

    It's not all about the POTUS. By electing a less polarizing figure in 2024 than either of these two, the nation could being the long, agonizing journey to recovery from Biden's devastating "reign of error". For POTUS we'd get a succession of one-termers, flipping from R to D to R to D, but during this time many of the communists would get flushed out of the House and Senate.

    Instead, we will get either a second term stolen by Biden, et al, or a third term earned by a severely harassed President Trump trying to make the pile of sh** sandwiches left by Biden taste better. Trump's third term would be a failure, thus allowing libtard rewriters of history to vindicate the communist anti-Trump obsession that started when Comrade Hillary was running against Trump for POTUS.

    Americans did not ask for this "you lose either way" choice. It's what we were given by a political system run by criminals. I have no idea how to fix it. I think all we can do is watch the circus and try to get a good laugh from it as we figure out how to survive the plundering and insanity.
     
  6. It may well be the Democrats who rescue America. A businessman and entrepreneur, Jason Palmer, defeated Brainless on Super Tuesday. The problem is Palmer is on the ballot in only 16 states. But you have to remember that the Primaries are not binding. The Party can nominate anyone it wants. A case in point is Brainless was a distant fourth and Cackling Kamala was dead last, and yet these two fools got nominated. A third Trump win would be contentious for the next four years, just as the previous two Trump wins were (and on the second one, they simply disregarded the election results with millions of fake mail-in ballots submitted after the polls closed).

    Palmer could fix a lot of the damage, setting things in motion for an unpolarized election in 2028. It could be a situation much like the Clinton years, where the Democrat POTUS works a Republican Congress to fix the economic problems. In that case, the family who owns the debt clock actually took it down. The Vietnam War debt that haunted us under LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Bush was finally reigned in. I'm not saying the Clinton years were all roses (look at the criminal safety aka gun ban insanity, for example), but they were certainly good for the economy because a lot of financial waste was eliminated. For example, Clinton had the Navy get rid of outdated surface ships such as the WWII era Mullinax class destroyers that cost a lot to operate but could not be used in modern warfare. He took a lot of heat for that, but stood his ground.
     
  7. It would be nice if both President Trump and pseudo-President Brainless both withdrew. While Trump proved himself to be a capable executive, the communists just will not let him govern. But what about Brainless? Cackling Kamala is clearly not a viable choice, but Big Mike, aka Michael Robinson, aka "Michelle" Obama is. If the communists / "Democrats" put him on the ticket after the "surprise" news that Brainless is too far gone to be POTUS, what would happen?

    Mike would have the backing of the very vocal and influential "trans" community, a voting bloc that now has some power. He would also be endorsed by people who believe that if you are "black" then you are required to avoid thinking for yourself at all costs. But would "black" people en masse vote for him? I think not. First, there's the fact that the Arab pretending to be black Obama used his eight years in office to set black people back a few decades. His economic policies were especially brutal on blacks. Second, blacks in general tend to be very religious or at least the majority of people who call themselves black are very religious. They idea of a cross-dresser or trans for President is something they will find repugnant. There's more to this, of course, but those factors would loom large.

    I think Governor Kelly of Kansas would be a good choice for the Democrat nomination, but her fatal flaw in their eyes is she is a rational person and does a good job serving her constituency. This flies in the face of the current dogma, which is to be utterly insane while damaging the constituency in as man ways as you can get by with. And as already mentioned, Palmer would not be a bad choice.

    I think the Republicans have several good choices, almost none of whom were on the primary ballot. Why were those people not there? Because they are smart, and they realized it would be The Donald Trump Show instead of an actual primary. So why spend time and money on it? Ron DeSantis was a good choice, but when you have a good state governor like that you keep him there as governor. He gets to build political capital for later, and his state reaps the  benefits in the meantime.
     
  8. Brainless is continuing his "black people must be morons" strategy. After insulting and violating values deeply had by the majority of "black people" and inflicting runaway inflation, joblessness, food shortages, etc. on people of all colors, he's still asserting that he supports "black people" and says "I have your back". He has their butt, not their back. I hope this truth continues to be realized by more and more people who call themselves black. The racism and condescension by Brainless might be tolerable, but the social and economic attacks by him are far more damaging that mere disrespect and should not be tolerated.
     
  9. I started subscribing to the Nutcase Newsletter years before Nutcase Nancy ended her stint as Speaker of the House. In her March edition, she had comments about Brainless Biden's budget. Not that it's insane and unaffordable, but that it includes millions of dollars of pork barrel spending for San Francisco alone. And of course, she and her supporters think this kind of illegal wealth transfer is just wonderful.
     
  10. The Tibetans chose Tenzin Gyatso as their Dalai Lama (leader) while he was still a child. When the communists invaded, he fled to India where he now lives in exile. The communists ignored the will of the people and appointed their own fake Dalai Lama in his place.

    In the USA, the American People chose Donald Trump as our POTUS (leader). During his first term, he did a very good job (based on metrics that matter to ordinary people) even though he often behaved childishly. Then the communists, who had already invaded, used mail-in ballot abuse and other attacks on the election system to ignore the will of the people and install their own fake leader in his place.

    We did not adequately stand up against the communists either time. This November, we will have what may be our last chance to ever stand up to them again. We need to win. Contact your county election board and ask what they are doing about election integrity. It's not a matter of convincing people to vote against Brainless (or Big Mike, depending on how things develop), because the vast majority of Americans can see how profoundly more awful life as become under communist rule. It's a matter of giving us our voice in choosing communism or Constitutionality. For many, it's a choice between communism and survival.

 

2. Product Highlight

The Rocket Pen is a life-changer for students and adults with reading difficulties. Scan words or lines from any screen (e.g., tablet, smart phone, computer) or printed material, and it not only reads to you but provides word definitions, word breakdown, and more to teach you to read (by "you" we mean the person you buy this for). The Rocket Pen Reader gives the reading-challenged their independence.

Buy the Rocket Pen on Amazon | eBay | Walmart

Watch this demo video: https://youtu.be/DQd4MBpv4B8

These features were added with the latest release:

  • Has dictionary lockout and ExamRead feature, so it doubles as an exam pen.
  • Left-hand user mode.
  • Scan left to right mode.
  • Fast shutdown.
  • Selectable voices for playback of scanned text.
  • Selectable UI language: English (default) or Spanish.
  • Includes both English and Spanish dictionaries.

Other features and benefits:

  • Allows students or adults with reading difficulties to gain independence and reading fluency without stigma.
  • Reading tutor functions include spelling, syllabication (how the word is "built"), and one word displayed in big font.
  • Syllables break for each word.
  • Direct lookup of phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions (for example, get ahead, get along, keep on, keep off, look forward to).
  • Uses colors for the different fields, to improve the understanding of the dictionary definition.
     
  • You scan, it reads to you.
  • Scans lines of text or individual words from almost any surface, not just paper. It can read the text on a computer, tablet, or phone.
  • Hear individual words or even multiple lines of text read aloud in natural voice.
     
  • Completely self-contained, no computer or Wi-Fi required.
  • Comes ready to use, no setup process (but customization can easily be done).
  • Full 1.9 inch color touch screen, and simple physical buttons for screenless scan and read.
     
  • Multiple built-in dictionaries to search definitions including the New Oxford American Dictionary (over twice the size of what the cPen uses) with Oxford Thesaurus of English (Americanized), Oxford American Children’s Dictionary with Oxford American Children’s Thesaurus, and English to Spanish dictionary.
  • Built-in speaker automatically mutes when earbuds are used, automatically unmutes when they aren't.
  • Meets FCC, ROHS, and CE standards.
  • Package includes ReaderPen, USB charging cable, Quick Start Guide, and earphones.

Rocket Pen

The Rocket Pen Reader is an affordable, powerful reading assistant and reading tutor that erases the barriers created by dyslexia and other reading problems. It can be used privately in the classroom, avoiding stigma, thanks to the earbuds included in the kit (it can alternatively be used without earbuds).

How it teaches reading

Before the early 1980s, public schools relied on phonics to teach reading. This allowed any student to "sound out" a new, unfamiliar word and also recognize its root and thereby often grasp its meaning even without a dictionary. Then schools switched to the "Look See" method, which treated words as individual pictograms to memorize. The results were dismal, plummeting the USA from the top of the literacy ranks to the bottom among industrialized countries.

The Rocket Pen puts phonics back in.

It also adds a context-driven dictionary and a context-driven thesaurus, both powerful tools for improving reading skills. See the reading tutor functions in the chart below.

It is the answer

The Rocket Pen Reader is the answer for helping the reading-challenged in the classroom, special needs classes, home-schooling, and adult education. Because of its mobile-friendly design, you can carry it with you and use it anywhere. Not only does it read to you, it helps you learn to read (for example, by showing you the syllable breakdown and the definition). It is super easy to use, no need to watch a dozen videos to figure out what to do.

Based on the highly successful ReadingPen 2 and vastly superior to the cPen Reader Pen, the RocketPen is the latest generation in a reading tutor scanning pen. It is a quantum leap or two beyond anything else on the market. This amazing device retails for $499, sells for $399 on Amazon and Walmart.com, but is on sale now for a limited time only via our eBay store at only $379!

It beats the competition

Compare the Rocket Pen to the competition. The winner here is obvious:


 
Rocket Pen cPen Reader OrCam Read
Amazon Price 399 285 1990
Color touchscreen Yes No No
Words appear in large font Yes No No
Scans phones, tablets, etc. Yes No Yes
Scans blocks of text Yes No Yes
Color-coded dictionary Yes No No
Simple physical buttons Yes Yes Yes
Ergonomic for kids Yes No No
English and Spanish Yes Yes Yes
Verbal commands No No Yes
Auto trigger upon contact Yes Yes No
Easy menu navigation Yes No No
Manufacturer experience, yrs 30 8 5
Product age Latest generation! 8 5

 

 

 

 
Reading Tutor Functions
 

 

 
Dictionary 1 New Oxford American (large) Oxford Primary (small) n/a
Dictionary 2 Oxford American Children’s n/a n/a
Thesaurus 1 New Oxford American Oxford Primary n/a
Thesaurus 2 Oxford American Children’s n/a n/a
Syllablication / word breakdown Yes No No
Hear word spelled out Yes No No
See word spelled out Yes No No
Part of speech Yes Yes No
Color coding in dictionary Yes No No
Headword Yes Yes No
Pronunciation guide Yes No No
Idioms Yes No No
Quick Define feature Yes No No

 

3. Brainpower tip

My first experience with e-mail was as a Systems Engineer for Bailey Controls, starting in 1989. We had the Banyan Vines network that allowed individual engineering work stations (the 80386 computers we used) to communicate with each other. We could send drawings and messages to each other. I found this totally amazing. We used to joke about somehow doing this in our personal lives, but who would run a Banyan Vines network for individuals? We concluded that some day, there would be e-mail for the masses because this was just so useful. It would have to be something other than an office network.

Then along came AOL. And we had mail! The content idea was patterned after sending paper letters. So early on, people composed those letters electronically. When received, e-mails were read with the same diligence and attention that paper letters were. That was on the typical 14 inch monitor of the time.

AOL also had Instant Messenger, kind of the equivalent of text messaging. Most people hated it, because it interrupted what you were doing to provide you with a very short message and the shortness made it not very useful.

When texting became mobile, it also became useful. Now you could send a short message that someone could easily read even though they had a tiny screen. This was great for things like, "On my way" or "Call me". It was not great for anything substantive.

At about the same time, the ability to get mail on your phone was provided. Gmail was integral to Android phones. You could have your mail server forward messages to your phone so you could at least see if anything urgent came in. No more lugging a laptop around to check e-mail while away from the office.

But then a twist came. Many people began relying on their phone-based e-mail all the time. After more than a few lines, e-mails become an eye-glazing experience. And that's because, due to its tiny screen, a phone works great for those (short) text messages but cannot properly display anything much beyond those.

I can now tell if a person is receiving my e-mails on their phone, because their reply indicates they didn't actually read the e-mail. They glanced through it, picking something out of context and assuming that's the gist. Usually, they miss everything important in that message. They end up looking stupid. Not only is GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) true, but so is NINO (nothing in, nothing out).

Use e-mail on a PC instead of a phone, and encourage your correspondents to do the same. It's a lot easier to read a detailed message on a 24 inch screen than on a 4 inch screen. And you won't end up looking stupid due to catching only part of the message.


4. Finance tip

While working on my 1040 tax filing this year, something dawned on me as I went through the interview process with the H&R Block software. Medical insurance payments are 100% deductible, but medical expenses are not.

On the latter, the rule is something like the amount you can deduct has to be the excess of $7500 that is 7.5% of your income (less the standard deduction). To make the example easy to follow, let's say it's 10%. So let’s say after the standard deduction your income is $60K, which means you can deduct medical expenses only after they exceed $7,500 + $4,500 = $12,000. If you had $13525 in medical expenses, you could deduct $1525. This will reduce your tax bill by $183, which is chump change compared to your monthly premiums.

Why is the tax code this way? It's done so that when people talk to an insurance agent, a huge selling point is the tax deductibility. So they can make it seem as if a high-cost, low-deductible insurance policy is the way to go because of the tax break. What they leave out is tax deductions really don't net you that much. Remember, the "tax rate" is the marginal rate. We have a bracketed system. People who are in the 30% or whatever bracket are paying that on only a portion of their income; overall, they probably pay closer to 12%. Which means they get 12 cents on the dollar. Being able to deduct an additional $3,000 of insurance premiums saves you only $360 on your taxes. You actually lose $2,640.

Unless you live the disease lifestyle, you are better off with a very lean medical insurance coverage (high deductibles) and then when you seek minor medical care do that as an uninsured person. Treat medical insurance as insurance not as a prepay plan. The idea is to protect your financial security against large losses. As an example, I had a bump on my abdomen. I was pretty sure it was a lipoma, but I needed diagnostics to confirm. I didn't have a primary care physician, so signed up with a regional medical care system as an uninsured patient. That status got me everything at about half price, which means instead of paying about $500 out of pocket for insurance deductibles (on top of the monthly premiums), I paid about $250. I can't deduct the $250 on my taxes and get the $30 in tax savings I'm "entitled to". But I came out $220 ahead by not doing that. Even if you had Obamacare with 100% reimbursement of the premiums, you are better off going as "uninsured" for things like this (just go as "uninsured" when it works out better than being "insured").

When you apply real math in place of the funny math done by the insurance lobby, you find that tax deductions should not enter into any consideration of how much insurance to carry. Though you can't deduct the out of pocket medical expenses, they cost far less than your tax-deductible insurance premiums especially when you consider those come with their own deductibles before coverage kicks in. Determine your insurance needs based on what your risks are and what you can afford to pay for as an uninsured. Don't allow tax deductibility to enter into the decision, due to the reasons stated.

You want to reduce your risks as much as is practical for you. But remember, you cannot eliminate risk 100%. I have an excellent homeowner's policy, it covers a lot and is affordable. I theoretically could skip it since the only thing likely to destroy my home is a fire and I have reduced fire risk to nearly zero. But "nearly" means it still could happen. To me, being "ripped off" by my insurer is a pleasure. I have even joked with my agent about this, stating I desire to never get my money's worth. He agrees. A problem with medical insurance is many people expect to get their "money's worth", so they opt for excess coverage and low deductibles. They really are being ripped off, and that's the point I am trying to make.


5. Security tip

From the Social Security Administration, Stop the Scam (oddly enough, it's not about the Covid scam): https://www.ssa.gov/fraud/assets/materials/EN-05-10597.pdf

And here's another resource: https://www.capitalone.com/digital/scam-education/?external_id=vanity_card_email

The Capital One page explains succinctly about scams. And on that page, there's a link to another page "Common Scams". They didn't include Fake Pandemic Scams or Fake Election Scams, but they did include many others. Worth sharing.

 

6. Health tip/Fitness tips

Statistics when this photo was taken, 10 days before my 63rd birthday:

  • Height: 6'0"

  • Wingspan: 6'1"

  • Weight: 152.6 lbs, which is more than the 148.8lbs from the 2022 shoot. I am also leaner for this one (notice the striations in my left pec).

  • Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says is 5%

  • Waist: 29

  • Chest: 48

  • Arms: 15

  • Quads: 20.25
     

  • Max bench press: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 10 reps with 150 lbs to warm up on chest day

  • Max squat: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 8 reps of front squats with 90lbs to start Leg Day

  • Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side

  • Testosterone: Above the upper limit of the normal range
     

  • Last illness: 1971

  • Last workout missed: Spring of 1977

  • Training days per week: 6

  • Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
     

  • Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day

  • Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 7 and 10

  • Percent of diet that is processed food: 0

  • Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0

  • Number of clot shots received: 0.

*********

See all of my climbing videos here: https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel. Some cool climbing  videos:

My hardest climb ever, a 5.11d on lead: https://youtu.be/UT5h0heUUBc . I made a dumb mistake initially, letting the rope wrap over my shoulder. Watch what happens.

The scale:

  • Beginner: 5.6. 5.7. 5.8, 5.9
  • Intermediate: 5.10a, b, c, d 5.11a, b, c, d
  • Advanced: 5.12a, b, c, d 5.13a, b, c, d. Almost nobody climbs at this level at any of the 5 local climbing gyms.
 
This is the time of year when people try to shed the holiday season fat and get in shape for summer. Unfortunately, the time left for losing the fat usually isn't sufficient for the amount of fat they desire to lose if the approach is gradual. So they are looking for something fairly radical.

Last year, intermittent fasting was all the rage. It seems to be retaining that status this year. There are two types:

  1. Day long or longer. You pick one day a period (week, 10 days, month) in which you either do not eat at all or eat only a very small meal before bed (so you aren't awake from hunger pains). Over the period this cuts your calories to 1/X, with X being the length of the period. So for 10 days, you'd reduce total calories by 10%. Do it every other day, and you get a 50% reduction in calories.
     
  2. Hours long. The idea here is you shrink the available hours in which you can eat. So instead of your first meal at (say) 0600 and your last one at (say) 2030, you eat your first meal at (say) 1200 and your last meal at (say) 1800. But your meal sizes stay the same, you are just skipping the ones that fall outside this window and thus you eat less. Instead of 14.5 hours in which to eat, you have only 8. A typical plan gives you a 40% calorie reduction every day.

These can, and often do, produce significant and rapid fat loss because they produce significant calorie deficits. Variation One automatically cycles you on and off the calorie deficit so that you don't get stuck in starvation mode. Variation Two sticks you into starvation mode, unless you cycle on and off it (for example, do it for two days per week).

Both of these have several problems and downsides, as does any diet that shocks your body. These include erratic bowel behavior, massive energy crashes, lack of mental focus (although a euphoric effect might make it seem the opposite), loss of lean mass, and an escalation of stress hormones.

Instead of panicking yourself into one of these severe diets, I suggest the following.

  • Since you were comfortable enough with your body to gorge over the holidays, be comfortable enough with it now to accept that going to the opposite extreme isn't necessary. You'll just have to go this summer looking like you should have eaten less this winter.
  • Think about the previous thought again. Don't worry about what others think, you don't have to be perfect this summer. Focus on getting your lifestyle into alignment with your fitness/fatness/appearance goals and let things happen over time. Set your eyes on NEXT summer.

You can accelerate a bit

But what if you want at least some faster improvement beyond what a consistent diet and training program will eventually get you to? The good news is there are some things you can do that don't cause stress hormone release or those other problems and that will get you faster progress. But again ask yourself just how important this is before you go there. Here are some of those things:

  • Try intermittent calorie reduction. Not fasting, but using a similar principle. For example, if you always have a handful of nuts (very healthy to do) late each afternoon, go one month eating them only on even numbered days. This could bounce your caloric intake below the loss line (fewer calories in than out) for a day, but you don't go into starvation mode because the next day you are at or above the line again. You can do this with any food. Just pick something to eat only on alternate days. Maybe you like to have one protein shake in the morning and one in the afternoon; skip the afternoon one on even numbered days.
     
  • Try total calorie reduction by whole food serving downsizing. When you buy bananas, apples, pears, sweet potatoes, etc., pick the smaller ones of those that are available. This won't save you a huge amount of calories, but you will have a reduced caloric intake that can be combined for effect with the strategy above.
     
  • Try intermittent meal downsizing. I meal prep, so all of my meals are planned. The size doesn't vary unless I make less at the prep stage. I prep most of these into glass bowls that I store in the refrigerator. What you can do once a week is take half a prepped meal out of its bowl to eat and leave the rest in there for the same meal the next day or the day after.

These three tactics avoid going into starvation mode. You don't feel deprived, don't get cravings, don't get bowel problems, and don't experience energy crashes. You may experience an hour or two of hunger in any given day, just drink water or tea to stave that off.

You can also use supplements:

  • Green coffee bean extract. It does contain caffeine, so use it only in the first half of the day.
  • L-carnitine. It shifts the body into fat burning. Because it's not a stimulant, it has long been called "the night time fat burner". Take this in the afternoon. Take some before bed, but don't overdo it. The more you go beyond the recommended dosage, the greater your risk of severe calf cramps.

And you can try not using certain supplements. For example, many people use a protein powder when their diet already provides more protein than they need. The body cannot store protein, so it's broken down to be stored as fat with some of the breakdown process leftover being uric acid that the kidneys have to deal with. If you have a bottle after bottle of supplements, remember that the capsules have calories. Not a lot per capsule, but they do add up.

Know when to stop

If you find yourself lagging in energy, as in your workouts are lame or you can't concentrate at work, stop with the calorie restriction. Lame workouts mean you do not get the adaptive response, in which case your testosterone will not become elevated and you will tend toward more fat and less muscle. If you can't concentrate at work, you put your job at risk and that's never a good idea.

Always keep in mind that unless your livelihood depends on having an extremely lean physique, there's no reason for you to go to extremes to get extremely lean. You can achieve that naturally over time, or you can naturally over time just maintain a body fat level that you are comfortable with and that puts you in the "healthy range" (this is a max of 8% body fat for men, something like twice that for women).

If your body looks a little soft or even pudgy, will your family or your real friends love you any less? Of course not. So don't worry about how people you don't even know will judge you. Most of them are too busy worrying about their own perceived imperfections that they think other people are judging them on.

My personal goals are different from what I have just discussed, but I have been at this for many decades and it's a thing for me. Even so, I do not resort to the extreme measures that are so common. I have had a few years in which I have not done a photoshoot because I was too fat. That's because I wasn't as disciplined in the cold months as I should have been to prepare for it and there was no way I would be lean enough without going on some crazy fat loss plan. I don't do the photoshoots to document how badly I can treat my body, I do them to document how well I treat my body. In those years I was too fat, I still went shirtless outside and got plenty of sunlight. So what if I wasn't lean enough for physique photos? Not the end of the world.

 

At www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:
  • The best workouts are short and intense.
  • A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction than the typical American diet.

7. Factoid

The United States is not a democracy, and let's hope it never will be. It is a democratic republic. What that means is the people elect representatives (city council, county board, state rep, state senator, federal rep, federal senators) who then deliberate to pass laws and the people elect specific executives (mayor, commissioner, sheriff, governor, President) to be in charge of executing them.

While Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and other racist pigs would like a democracy, it is a very undesirable form of government. A commonly cited example is ten people gathered around a tree to vote on whether to hang one of them by a rope and that one is the only black person among them. In a democracy, the emotions of the moment rule and those emotions are seldom, if ever, based on rational analysis. A democratic republic has the rule of law (follow the laws, everyone is equal before the law) while in a Democracy it is really rule by intimidation, gaslighting, lying, and bullying.

 

8. Thought for the Day

When people use fear and intimidation to get you to accept their viewpoint, there is almost no chance their viewpoint is correct. Else, they'd argue on its merits.

 

 

Please forward this eNL to others.

Authorship

The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!). The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or other brainwashed individuals. That's because those fools live in an alternate reality and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works. They cannot do basic math, cannot apply logic, and cannot be bothered to learn the basic facts relevant to any topic that they are passionate about.

Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified. Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort. Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).

Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter. It is an act of service, almost no money is generated for me through this effort. Thank you for being a faithful reader. Please pass this newsletter along to others.


Articles | Book Reviews | Free eNL | Products

Contact Us | Home

This material, copyright Mindconnection. Don't make all of your communication electronic. Hug somebody!