In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness |
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
|
|
Please forward this to others who might find
it useful. If you have a
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link:
https://www.mindconnection.com
|
|
Socialism isn't an ideology.
It's a deadly pathology. Engage brain to prevent infection.
1. Good News
Item 1. Several Democrats in Congress have publicly spoken out against
the election fraud and other crimes being committed by the Socialist Party. One
even spoke out against the socialist known as AOC for jumping to the head of the
line to get a Covid vaccination. Just as the "Democratic" Party was hijacked
from within, a rising tide of pushback against the insanity is coming from
within. That could mean if Biden/Harris are successful in stealing the election,
they will also be powerless to enact the zaniest, most destructive parts of the
socialist agenda.
Item 2. The socialist known as AOC has attacked senior socialists in
her party (Schumer and Pelosi, most notably) and that has put her in a
precarious position. She followed that "brilliant" move with her vaccine stunt.
She is making herself radioactive, even to the socialists who gave her the
office she holds. The good news is she will likely be marginalized for the rest
of her two-year term at which point the socialists will rig the election in her
district to cause her to "lose" instead of rigging it to cause her to "win".
Item 3. Senator John Hawley of Missouri has committed to challenging
the Electoral College results of the ginned-up election. For the challenge to
move forward, at least one member of each chamber must commit to challenging the
results. Several members of the House have already done so. Despite all of the
egregious law-breaking to this point, the caper has not yet completely avoided
every fatal obstacle presented by the 12th Amendment. And now the 74 million and
plus voters who were disenfranchised by the fraud may soon have our rights
restored. If we don't, then it's a situation of taxation without representation.
If that's where politicians (including that awful Chief Justice) want to leave
things, they would be at odds with the vast majority of decent, hard-working
Americans.
|
2. Product Highlight
The ONYX BOOX Poke 2 Color is the first ebook reading device with a color
screen of the E Ink Kaleido "electronic paper" type. The Poke 2 Color reader
has a compact lightweight case of only 6.8 mm of thickness and is equipped with
a high-performance 8 core processor, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modules. It runs on the
Android 9.0 operating system.
- Screen is 6", E Ink Kaleido, 4096 colors, 1072 x 1448 px, 300 ppi (100 ppi in
color mode).
- Supported file formats: TXT, HTML, RTF, FB2, FB2.zip, DOC, DOCX, PRC,
MOBI, CHM, PDB, DOC, EPUB, JPG, PNG, GIF, BMP, PDF, DjVu, MP3, WAV, CBR, CBZ.
- This ebook reader supports OTG and a USB jack, which allow you to connect
additional peripherals that do not require the installation of additional
drivers.
- Processor: 8 core, 2 GHz.
- RAM: 2 GB.
- Internal memory: 32 GB.
- Android 9.0
- Size: 153 x 107 x 6.8 mm.
- Weight: 150.
- Battery: Li-on 1500 mAh
- High quality cover case included.
Buy yours now.
|
 |
|
3. Brainpower tip
Libtards are notorious for excluding all facts except irrelevant ones when
making a decision or when spewing one of their ridiculous arguments. But the irrelevancy problem
also befalls intelligent people. You may not have noticed it much but it has
very likely affected you. This kind of thing can creep up on a person. What
to do: Before reaching a conclusion, determine which facts
are relevant. Exclude those that are not. Now you have a set of facts that may
vary in weight. Suppose you bought a $900 item and it stopped working. Your goal
is to get a replacement or refund with the least amount of time and hassle. So
what facts would be relevant to the service person you contact and in which
order should you present them? Which facts will have little bearing on the
outcome whether included or not?
What about solving a dispute? We had a dispute with a vendor who billed us
for what we ordered rather than for what they shipped. Their billing did not
provide any means of tying the amount to a particular order, and several orders
simply did not ship. We had tracking numbers for the ones that we ordered, and
from those determined what actually shipped. They insisted there was no way they
could have not shipped any units they prepped for us (the software loaded onto
these items is the major cost component) yet there were X units unaccounted for.
After a week of going back and forth with them and answering irrelevant
questions, I made a conclusive determination.
How did I do that? I created a spreadsheet of all sold units, returns, and
inventory. The net of these equals the total units shipped by them. Then I
tallied up the cost of the net shipped units to arrive at what we would owe if
we had never paid them. After that, I went into our payment method and generated
a report of all payments made to them. The sum of those payments subtracted from
the cost of the net shipped units equals our balance on account. They were off
by quite a bit, and not in our favor. With my rep, I worked out a solution
to this vendor's irregular methods of billing and accounting to avoid confusion
in the future.
The takeaway: Sorting out the problem and devising a solution for the future were both made
possible by determining which facts were relevant to the question.
In my late teens, I started studying karate. I quickly learned what was
relevant in sparring, because being slow to catch on is painful. Focusing on
what is relevant has helped me quickly sort problems that had vexed others for
years, and this pattern has been with me for as long as I can remember. It's a
way of being. If you find yourself derailed by irrelevancies, make a point of
ignoring things that don't really matter. Be consistent, and this will be an
automatic response.
Your feelings are not relevant. Many times in a disagreement, people let the anger they feel at being
mistreated enter into the "discussion". How upset you are is not relevant.
Let's say John and Erica are married, and John leaves his underpants on the
floor instead of putting them in the hamper. Erica may take this juvenile
behavior as a personal insult, but she shouldn't. The problem she wants to solve
is John's failure to put his underpants in the hamper. A simple (but not
optimal) solution is to tell John if she has to pick them up, she will throw
them in the trash. And then do that. If John retaliates, what should Erica do?
Again stick with the relevant facts. The most relevant fact is underpants go in
the hamper, not on the floor. The second most relevant fact is John must solve
the problem of leaving them on the floor.
Whatever the problem is, you can't solve it efficiently or perhaps even
correctly by considering irrelevant facts. The other side of that coin is you
must include all relevant facts, especially those that do not support your
initial hypothesis. Always define the issue that is under consideration. And
then research what facts are germane to that issue.
Erica originally thought John doesn't love her, because she finds this
behavior disrespectful. But is that disrespect aimed at her? Is it even
disrespect at all? So she asks John's mother out for coffee and asks about this.
"Oh, I was always after that boy to put his shoes away instead of leaving them
at the door for people to trip over. When he was 14, I went into his room to get
the laundry hamper and it was empty. There were dirty clothes all over the
floor. I didn't pick them up, and he ran out of clean clothes. When he
complained about this, I told him I wash only what's in his hamper."
Now Erica has relevant facts that change her view of the situation. She was
the one at fault, because unlike John's mother she picked up his dirty underwear
from the floor and washed it. Throwing it away is wasteful, but since she shares
a bedroom with John it's not an option to leave those things on the floor. Her
new solution? Simply put John's dirty underpants back into his underpants
drawer. If John wants them washed, he will have to put them in the hamper; same
as when he lived at home with his mom and dad. Can you think of other solutions?
Are they relevant to the problem? |
4. Finance tip
This could be a brainpower tip or security tip, too.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1341948611131822083. Watching that video is a
brain-empowering act. If you take action based on the insight you gain from that
video, you will take a big step toward protecting your financial security. If
you pass that video to as many people as you can and ask them to also take
action then together we help protect our collective financial security. |
5. Security tip
Facebook has long been a "do not enter" zone for "in the know" people
concerned about their personal security, financial well-being, and limited
time on earth. And with Zuckerberg's aggressive participation in the socialist coup, many thinking
people have quit using this parasite. But if you are still among the Facebook faithful, perhaps a little more information on its dangers will
help you join the boycott. See this article:
https://blog.malwarebytes.com/malwarebytes-news/2020/12/the-many-ways-you-can-be-scammed-on-facebook-part-i
It's just another in the long line of reasons to say Face Slap or Butt
Book instead of Facebook. And to get it completely out of your life. |
|
6. Health tip/Fitness tips
 |
The photos tell you something important about my credibility. Statistics
on 60th birthday, when these photos were taken:
-
Height: 6'0"
-
Wingspan: 6'1"
-
Weight: 148lbs
-
Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says
is 5%.
-
Waist: 29
-
Chest: 48
-
Arms: 15
-
Quads: 20
-
Max bench press: Unknown, but I do three sets of 12 reps with 150 lbs
to warm up on chest day
-
Training days per week: 6
-
Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
-
Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day
-
Percent of diet that is processed food: 0
-
Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0
-
Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 8 and 10
-
Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side
-
Last illness: 1971
-
Last workout missed: Spring of 1977
|
 |
See
my climbing videos here:
https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel |
|
See this article:
https://www.bodybuilding.com/content/8-lessons-from-my-grandfather-the-bodybuilder.html
Key takeaways:
- Fitness isn't an extra thing you do if you have spare time for it.
Fitness is your way of life. That's why I do not skip meals and do not
skip workouts. I schedule other things around them rather than try to
squeeze them in "if I can." People who "don't have time" to eat properly
or train just don't have their priorities straight. Yet.
- Training sessions alone do not suffice. I engage in many physical
activities. Seasonally, there is the outdoor stuff such as pruning,
mowing, raking, shoveling, landscape repairs, gardening. I do home
improvement and repair projects. I also climb regularly. Among other
things on my long list of activities I play with my cat. Housework,
doing things with my significant other, and just doing some new physical
activity to try it out; all of these help.
- Be in it for the long haul. When I set out on my "no more disease"
quest in the mid-1960s, I had a life-long trajectory in mind. In
climbing, there are often problems I could climb if I wanted to risk an
injury. But I have nothing to prove so I don't bother with them. This
will allow me to climb regularly for perhaps three more decades (most
people give up at about age 30).
- Pay attention to your body. Arnold taught me this (not personally,
it was something he said publicly). Adjust your activity and even your
training so you don't overdo it.
- Find something what works well for you. I hate back squats. They are
dangerous and difficult to do properly. I do front squats, instead. For
my training, I use dumbbells, barbells, a chinning bar, a lat pull-down
accessory, a leg curl accessory, bands, bodyweight, and some other
items. I don't use kettle bells, because I already have what I like and
don't need to go there. But for some people, kettle bells are do bomb.
I've designed each of my workouts and follow the same ones rather than
make something up each time. These workouts get modified over time, but
gradually. Find what works for you, and stick with it.
- Don't get mired down in complex meal practices. Focus on eating high
quality food and not skipping meals.
- Be free of the need for outside motivation. When I started my quest,
nobody cared so nobody was supportive. As it went on, I endured ridicule
and other forms of opposition. I was not doing this for the approval of
others. I was doing it for myself. And now I have the approval of others
anyhow. On my last climbing session before writing this, I was climbing
with someone I hadn't previously climbed with. A couple of hours into
it, we were looking at what to climb next when he made a comment that I
must be really serious about my training; "Your arms really show it."
That was nice to hear, but I train regardless of what anyone says.
- It's not about reaching a goal. Some guys will train and train until
they can bench their own body weight. Mission accomplished, they train
less and less until they are not training at all. I passed that body
weight thing decades ago, and it wasn't even a goal. I don't train to
reach some end point and graduate from training. I train for many of the
same reasons I eat and sleep.
|
|
|
At
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:- The best workouts are short and intense.
- A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction
than the typical American diet.
|
7. Factoid
There is a strong correlation between age and a decrease in male testosterone
levels. But correlation is not causation. This correlation exists because of the
accumulative effects of poor habits and poor choices, such as chronic intake of
endocrine modifiers and lack of commitment to a rigorous physical training
program. |
8. Thought for the Day
"The man who knows the truth is not equal to the man who
loves the truth. The man who loves the truth is not equal to the man who
delights in it." - Confucius |
Please forward this eNL to others.
Authorship
The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or
other brainwashed individuals. That's because they live in an alternate reality
and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified.
Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!).
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others.
|