radios, 12 volt electronics, translators, electrical exam prep, spy gadgets
Bookmark and Share
Amazon Store eBay Store Walmart Store Articles  Brainpower Newsletter Contact Us     Home  Search

Request to be put on our jokelist, one joke daily and a lot of original stuff you won't get anywhere else


This page is the original source of this review, though you may also find it on Amazon or other sites.

Book Reviews Home   Free Audio Books

Book Review of: The Compass

From Where You Are...To Where You Want To Be

Price: $16.29
List Price: $23.69
You save: $7.66 (32%)

Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours
Click on the image to order or find more books like this.

Review of The Compass, by Tammy Kling and John Spencer Ellis (Softcover, 2009)

(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you want a hardcopy)

Reviewer: Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.

Through the course of thirteen chapters, this book teaches 10 life lessons. The authors took care to create an separate section after the story part to pull these out and briefly discuss each one in a separate section called Reader's Key. The 10 lessons are the point of the book, so in that sense it follows the traditional "10" arrangement of self-help books (which are usually arranged in 10 chapters).

The lessons are not the pabulum that passes for wisdom in many of today's books in the guidance genre. Instead, they are the deeper lessons that can be life-changing if pondered and applied. This book doesn't provide a 10-step recipe for becoming a new person or a discussion of who moved your cheese. Each of the lessons involves taking control of what life hands you and moving forward with it, instead of letting events control you.

The reader follows the protagonist (Jonathon) through his adventures and sees life lessons revealed as the story unfolds. Unfortunately, the authors try to help this process along rather than let it emerge organically (more on that, in a moment). Still, they kept things interesting enough that I started and finished this book on the same day even though it's over 200 pages long.

A few lines in the book resonated with me. For example, one of the characters said most people are on autopilot and go through their day without thinking about what they are actually doing. This has been a topic of discussion many times in the Mindconnection newsletter, and it's a concept that has profound implications.

Being an automaton makes life easier, but it leaves the richness out. It's like making coffee without adding the grounds. And it's normal. That problem is addressed through more than one of the lessons in the book. It's also a core problem that the protagonist overcomes.

If you're thinking about how to have a more fulfilling life, this book is worth reading and contemplating. But as a novel, it's rough. Reading it reminded me of a method of teaching I have seen in schools ranging from the religious to the martial arts. It involves telling a story to illustrate a point. It's not about the story, but about the point being made. The effort doesn't go into fully developing the story or the characters in it. The story exists not to be a solid story in its own right, but to provide a framework for visualizing and learning the lesson. That's what this book is, rather than a fully-developed novel.

This book has problems in dialogue and characterization. The problems are intertwined--mostly cardboard characters delivering exposition. The main character is developed fairly well and the reader can care about him, but the other characters seem to exist for the purpose of preaching to the main character.

The most egregious characterization is that of a 10-year old street urchin who is multi-lingual and exudes the wisdom of a very experienced adult. This is explained by referring to him as an "old soul." It would be better to delete this character entirely, or rewrite so he's the appropriate age and status for the dialogues and monologues attributed to him.

One egregious misuse of dialogue occurs during Jonathan's second meeting with his wife after his return. We have this intense emotional scene, and suddenly she launches into an expositional monologue that has nothing to do with the emotions the character would be feeling at that point.

Despite these flaws, the authors did manage to maintain a certain tension and did have a fairly believable plot. In Alfred Hitchcock parlance, the hero was chasing a McGuff and didn't find it until near the end. So, the potential is there for turning this into a novel that also teaches instead of merely a book that uses a story to teach.

So, what are the ten lessons? If I told you, I'd be giving away too much. But here's something to get you started. One of the characters says, "How many summers or falls do you have left, Jonathon?" Then he goes on to essentially say we can fill those remaining summers with happiness or with negative emotions. Your choice. Over the past few years, I've become fond of saying, "Life is short." That simple concept is very instructive. This book explores several ways in which it is and what to do about it.

After you read the book, you'll understand why the title, The Compass, fits so well. The ten lessons are really about getting your bearings and determining your direction. An incident can cause a compass to get stuck, so it gives you the wrong bearings. Follow it, and you go in the wrong direction. Is your life compass able to find true north, or is it stuck on a false point? Life, after all, is a journey. This book can help you make sure you're traveling in the right direction.



About these reviews

You may be wondering why the reviews here are any different from the hundreds of "reviews" posted online. Notice the quotation marks?

I've been reviewing books for sites like Amazon for many years now, and it dismays me that Amazon found it necessary to post a minimum word count for reviews. It further dismays me that it's only 20 words. If that's all you have to say about a book, why bother?

And why waste everyone else's time with such drivel? As a reader of such reviews, I feel like I am being told that I do not matter. The flippancy of people who write these terse "reviews" is insulting to the authors also, I would suspect.

This sound bite blathering taking the place of any actual communication is increasingly a problem in our mindless, blog-posting Webosphere. Sadly, Google rewards such pointlessness as "content" so we just get more if this inanity.

My reviews, contrary to current (non) standards, actually tell you about the book. I always got an "A" on a book review I did as a kid (that's how I remember it anyhow, and it's my story so I'm sticking to it). A book review contains certain elements and has a logical structure. It informs the reader about the book.

A book review may also tell the reader whether the reviewer liked it, but revealing a reviewer's personal taste is not necessary for an informative book review.

About your reviewer

  • Books are a passion of mine. I read dozens of them each year, plus I listen to audio books.
  • Most of my "reading diet" consists of nonfiction. I think life is too short to use your limited reading time on material that has little or no substance. That leads into my next point...
  • In 1990, I stopped watching television. I have not missed it. At all.
  • I was first published as a preteen. I wrote an essay, and my teacher submitted it to the local paper.
  • For six years, I worked as an editor for a trade publication. I left that job in 2002, and still do freelance editing and authoring for that publication (and for other publications).
  • No book has emerged from my mind onto the best-seller list. So maybe I'm presumptuous in judging the work of others. Then again, I do more describing than judging in my reviews. And I have so many articles now published that I stopped counting them at 6,000. When did I stop? Probably 20,000 articles ago! (It's been a while).
  • I have an engineering degree and an MBA, among other "quant" degrees. That helps explain my methodical approach toward reviews.
  • You probably don't know anybody who has made a perfect or near perfect score on a test of Standard Written English. I have. So, a credential for whatever it's worth.

About reading style

No, I do not "speed read" through these. That said, I do read at a fast rate. But, in contrast to speed reading, I read everything when I read a book for review.

Speed reading is a specialized type of reading that requires skipping text as you go. Using this technique, I've been able to consistently "max out" a speed reading machine at 2080 words per minute with 80% comprehension. This method is great if you are out to show how fast you can read. But I didn't use it in graduate school and I don't use it now. I think it takes the joy out of reading, and that pleasure is a big part of why I read.

Articles | Book Reviews | Free eNL | Products

Contact Us | Home

This material, copyright Mindconnection. Don't make all of your communication electronic. Hug somebody!