| ||||||
|
This page is the original source of this review, though you may also find it on Amazon or other sites. | ||
Book Reviews Home | Free Audio Books |
![]() |
Book Review of: Pink Brain Blue BrainHow small differences grow into troublesome gaps--and what we can do about it. Price:
$16.50 Availability: Usually ships
within 24 hours |
Review
of
Pink Brain Blue Brain, by Lise Eliot, PhD (Hardcover, 2009) (You can print this review in landscape mode, if you want a hardcopy) Reviewer: Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles This is an excellent work. Not only is it informative and factual, it's a joy to read. It's well-written, exhaustively researched, and well-structured. It's outstanding work by a competent author. Unlike most books in the nonfiction genre, it actually is nonfiction. And it's honest. The author does express her opinions, but either with substantiation or some indication she's not presenting conclusions as elemental facts. She's very careful to inform, rather than manipulate, the reader. Her opinions are confined to the subject of the book and her areas of expertise, so they belong in the book. Also impressive is the fact that she doesn't hide behind jargon. She makes a point, throughout the book, of being clear in what she means. I said earlier that the book is exhaustively researched. The bibliography goes on for 45 pages (that's not a typo), though the book itself is only 315 pages. The number of books Dr. Eliot tapped for this book exceeds the number of books read in a lifetime by 10 average Americans. And these aren't vapid fad books put out by people who have a lecturing gig and sell self-published hokum in the back of the room. As a subject matter expert, Dr. Eliot could have skipped the research and still written a factual and authoritative book. And unlike so many authors today, she does not quote such disinformation sources as the New York Times (I mention that issue frequently in my reviews, because if I wanted to be disinformed I'd get the paper and skip a book based on it). Our public education dollars are largely mis-spent these days. Most of the funds extracted from us go toward new buildings for the people who choose to move away from where the schools are, a crazy and unethical wasting of huge volumes of tax dollars. In terms of literacy rates and math skills, the USA is near the bottom among industrialized countries and the fact we squander resources on erecting buildings rather than providing quality education can't be helping. Because of the dismal misuse of educational resources, we have a shortage of Americans entering engineering schools and taking on other challenging curricula. The average American graduating from high school can't pass a test of Standard Written English. Evidence of a raging stupidity epidemic is all around us. Adding to these problems is today's frequently spewed view that boys are dumb and shouldn't be expected to be competent communicators, readers, speakers, etc. People who specialize in psychobabble love to talk about this problem. Except it doesn't exist. And this is the thing that Dr. Eliot takes by the horns. The fact is that race, gender, and other groupings tell you absolutely nothing about an individual. Yes, there are differences between the sexes. But they are not what pop culture "experts" allege. Unfortunately, public policy often gets formed based on "expert" views that are flatly wrong.
In this book, Dr. Eliot discusses what the differences are. She looks at which ones come from nature, which ones come from nurture, and which ones don't even exist. Most of what she says directly contradicts the majority view of today's influential talking heads. Let me remind you again of the 45 pages of bibliography. While most nonfiction books have a ten chapter format, Dr. Eliot chose an eight chapter format. The book also has an extensive, informative introduction. The bibliography could be considered a chapter of recommended reading. You could count ten chapters, if an eight chapter format bothered you. In any case, instead of adding two chapters of fluff to meet the standard formula, she produced an overall solid work. It's consistent, cohesive, and comprehensible. Chapter 1 begins, not coincidentally, with life in the womb. Here, Dr. Eliot looks at how boy and girl babies start to differentiate. She explains how and when, and what actually happens. The book then proceeds chronologically. Chapter 2 looks at the toddler years, Chapter 3 looks at the preschool years, and Chapter 4 looks at the start of school. At each stage, we see the development and the biology that goes with it. We also see the cultural influences. Dr. Eliot provides substantial references to studies and data, frequently debunking various myths at their sources. Chapter 5 is an amazing look at how we learn language (verbal and written). As would be expected, Dr. Eliot debunks myth after myth about gender differences in this area. She does the same in the next chapter, "Sex, Math, and Science." No book on the differences between males and females would be complete without some discourse on love and war. We get that in Chapter 7. The final chapter, Truce Time, draws conclusions from the rest of the book and provides Dr. Eliot's recommendations for helping both boys and girls excel. There isn't an inferior sex that we need to rescue or write off, contrary to the written works of people who hold this view. The current approach of "Success through Stereotypes" isn't based on reality. Thus, anything that is based in reality doesn't rely on stereotypes. I found Dr. Eliot's recommendations quite sensible. They are fair, practical, and achievable. This book is a "must read" for mentors, parents, counselors, and teachers. I'd like to say it's a "must read" for makers of public policy, but since they rarely read a bill before voting on it there's no point. Replacing harmful stereotypes with actual fact is perhaps the main thing this book accomplishes. And that's an important benefit for the reader. Whether these stereotypes are excuses for others to hold you back or excuses for you to hold yourself back, you can beat them if you have the facts. Many of the theories in pulp culture are fiction, but have made their way into the nonfiction genre. This book helps restore the integrity of that genre, while also proving it's not necessary to make stuff up for a book to be a pleasure to read. |
About these reviewsYou may be wondering why the reviews here are any different from the hundreds of "reviews" posted online. Notice the quotation marks? I've been reviewing books for sites like Amazon for many years now, and it dismays me that Amazon found it necessary to post a minimum word count for reviews. It further dismays me that it's only 20 words. If that's all you have to say about a book, why bother? And why waste everyone else's time with such drivel? As a reader of such reviews, I feel like I am being told that I do not matter. The flippancy of people who write these terse "reviews" is insulting to the authors also, I would suspect. This sound bite blathering taking the place of any actual communication is increasingly a problem in our mindless, blog-posting Webosphere. Sadly, Google rewards such pointlessness as "content" so we just get more if this inanity. My reviews, contrary to current (non) standards, actually tell you about the book. I always got an "A" on a book review I did as a kid (that's how I remember it anyhow, and it's my story so I'm sticking to it). A book review contains certain elements and has a logical structure. It informs the reader about the book. A book review may also tell the reader whether the reviewer liked it, but revealing a reviewer's personal taste is not necessary for an informative book review. About your reviewer
About reading styleNo, I do not "speed read" through these. That said, I do read at a fast rate. But, in contrast to speed reading, I read everything when I read a book for review. Speed reading is a specialized type of reading that requires skipping text as you go. Using this technique, I've been able to consistently "max out" a speed reading machine at 2080 words per minute with 80% comprehension. This method is great if you are out to show how fast you can read. But I didn't use it in graduate school and I don't use it now. I think it takes the joy out of reading, and that pleasure is a big part of why I read. |
|