| ||||||
|
This page is the original source of this review, though you may also find it on Amazon or other sites. | ||
Book Reviews Home | Free Audio Books |
![]() |
Book Review of: Allies And EnemiesHow the World Depends on Bacteria Price:
$17.99 Availability: Usually ships
within 24 hours |
Review
of
Allies And Enemies, by
Anne Maczulak (Hardcover, 2010) (You can print this review in landscape mode, if you want a hardcopy) Reviewer: Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles. Ms. Maczulak did an excellent job with this book. It's factually correct and well-written, making it both pleasurable and educational to read. That's really saying something, considering that college texts on the subject of microbiology have a reputation for being rather challenging to read and understand. It's not that those books are badly done, it's that the topic is complex. Ms. Maczulak removes the complexity to bring us a good overview of the role of bacteria in our lives and in the larger world around us. She exposes and corrects many myths, while also keeping her narrative in a framework that moves forward and helps the reader get "the big picture." Without crossing it, she walks the fine line between eye-glazing detail and enough detail to be a rich read. My eyes didn't glaze over once, during my reading of this book. When I started reading this book, I thought it would be a good academic refresher. Before I finished reading it, that thought changed entirely. I think for most people, it is essential reading. A small example explains why. Before I finished reading this book, I heard a radio commercial (I listen to the radio for a total of maybe 3 hours per month) for a product that should not be on the market. The commercial encourages parents to buy a chlorinated product for the kids to take to school and wipe everything with. Deliberately poisoning people is illegal, but for some reason if you poison kids with this product you won't go to jail for it. The hype is that this protects children from nasty bacteria. Parents who don't understand what is profoundly wrong with this product and why it's also unnecessary need to start educating themselves about the real world. This book provides a good start in that direction. I happen to enjoy various little critters. When I'm tending my basil plants, a friendly honeybee or two will land on my arm. I have never been stung by a honeybee, in half a century of enjoying their company. The idea that we need to smear our bodies with DEET before going outside is absurd, and it has health and psychological costs. The same is true for critters so little that we cannot see them. It's not possible to live without bacteria. The idea that all bacteria are bad is based on disinformation, ignorance, and fear. Ms. Maczulak adroitly explains the truth in this book, so the reader is informed. It's not that all bacteria are bad and there are only a few good varieties. The world of bacteria is diverse and enormous, and most bacteria do us no harm. In fact, the bacteria-phobia that helps sell toxic products to people who don't take the time to learn the truth not only results in their being poisoned with carcinogenic chemicals, but it also helps throw their bacterial balance out of whack. The anti-bacterial soaps and related products do not prevent disease. The author does not say that in so many words, but everyone educated in this topic knows why that statement is true. If you read this book, you will also know why it's true (if you do not already know). Bacteria are letting us live on their planet. They clean up our wastes (including oil spills), provide the foundations of the food chain (we'd have no food without bacteria to do what they do), and do many other things that we take for granted. Ms. Maczulak points out that there's a good chance bacteria hold the solutions to many problems we face today. These include everything from oil production (right now, we don't actually produce oil--we merely remove it from where it is) to cleaning up mining waste (a problem that is destroying Appalachia).
This book consists of seven chapters, an epilogue (its content should actually be an appendix, not an epilogue), an appendix, extensive references, and an index. Chapter 1 explains why the world needs bacteria. You can't help but draw this conclusion from the facts presented. Chapter 2 talks about bacteria in history, and Chapter 4 discusses their role in popular culture. Chapter 3 is between those two discussions and it explains how bacteria mutate, reproduce, and do other things with DNA. At this point, the book takes off in a different direction. Chapter 5 looks at the many uses for bacteria. Chapter 6 looks at ecosystems, macrobiology, and the diversity of bacteria. Chapter 7 discusses such things as how bacteria provide food, can provide energy, and do clean up waste; it explores also how these benefits may be expanded in the future. The Epilogue is titled, "How microbiologists grow bacteria." It's interesting material, but it isn't a epilogue to the book. It's the kind of information that goes into an appendix. Not a big error on the part of the publisher, but an error nonetheless. The Appendix the book does have is a resource for further reading and research if you are so inclined. On the references, I had no doubt while reading that this book had been properly researched. It just rang true all throughout. When I saw the actual references, however, it was a bit of a jawdropper. If you've ever read the texts required for a college-level microbiology class, you know that it's no small feat to get through them. In contrast to most alleged works of non-fiction today, Ms. Maczulak:
Don't just add this to your collection. Get a copy for your health practitioner, a copy for your medical doctor, and a copy for your best friend. If you're a parent with kids in school, get a copy for the principal and then try to get those fume-spewing carcinogenic surface wipes banned. |
About these reviewsYou may be wondering why the reviews here are any different from the hundreds of "reviews" posted online. Notice the quotation marks? I've been reviewing books for sites like Amazon for many years now, and it dismays me that Amazon found it necessary to post a minimum word count for reviews. It further dismays me that it's only 20 words. If that's all you have to say about a book, why bother? And why waste everyone else's time with such drivel? As a reader of such reviews, I feel like I am being told that I do not matter. The flippancy of people who write these terse "reviews" is insulting to the authors also, I would suspect. This sound bite blathering taking the place of any actual communication is increasingly a problem in our mindless, blog-posting Webosphere. Sadly, Google rewards such pointlessness as "content" so we just get more if this inanity. My reviews, contrary to current (non) standards, actually tell you about the book. I always got an "A" on a book review I did as a kid (that's how I remember it anyhow, and it's my story so I'm sticking to it). A book review contains certain elements and has a logical structure. It informs the reader about the book. A book review may also tell the reader whether the reviewer liked it, but revealing a reviewer's personal taste is not necessary for an informative book review. About your reviewer
About reading styleNo, I do not "speed read" through these. That said, I do read at a fast rate. But, in contrast to speed reading, I read everything when I read a book for review. Speed reading is a specialized type of reading that requires skipping text as you go. Using this technique, I've been able to consistently "max out" a speed reading machine at 2080 words per minute with 80% comprehension. This method is great if you are out to show how fast you can read. But I didn't use it in graduate school and I don't use it now. I think it takes the joy out of reading, and that pleasure is a big part of why I read. |
|