A large eastern utilitys outage-to-outage production goals for its 2,052-megawatt
coal-fired generating station once were unattainable because of unscheduled down time. The
problem was erosion on induced draft fan airfoils (blades). The erosion had been
increasing in recent years due to a combination of factors, including worn separation
equipment, the use of lower grades of coal, and reduced combustion temperatures. The
result was an increase in unpredictable forced outages, coming as frequently as every
three to five months.
Unscheduled outages seemed inevitable, because fly ash constantly bombarded the hollow
blades of the induced draft fan. This bombardment erodes the airfoil, eventually blowing a
hole in the blade. Then the fly ash fills the hole, causing a significant weight
imbalance. As a result, the fans trip and the boiler shuts down.
During a typical outage lasting up to four days, the utility lost the use of the
affected boiler (each of the generating plants three boilers has two induced draft
fans). For every inactive boiler hour, the utility had to replace nearly 600 megawatts of
electricity. And they paid as much as $200 per megawatt.
Recognizing it was impossible to prevent particulate matter from passing through the
system, the utility decided to concentrate its efforts on making the system more resistant
to damage from fly ash. Several remedies met with failure.
Earlier testing by EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) came to the utilitys
attention. The test results cited Conforma Clads tungsten carbide coating as the
most resistant to fly ash erosion of nearly thirty materials tested. Conforma Clad®
coatings consist of precisely size-controlled tungsten carbide particles embedded in a
matrix of braze alloy (primarily nickel and chromium). The particles bond metallurgically
to each other and to the substrate, with bond strength up to 70,000 psi. The carbide gives
superior resistance to abrasion, while the matrix provides ductility and resistance to
erosion and corrosion.
Airfoil erosion shields typically consist of two heavy pieces of steel. Hardface weld
overlays, or sprays, protect the shields. One piece is a liner that conforms to the
geometry of the airfoil, while the other is a horseshoe-shaped piece for centerplate
protection. A welded seam joins the two pieces. The utility determined the highest erosion
was at the junction of the centerplate and airfoil. Regardless of the wear protection
material used, all previous installations had one thing in common: the area most
vulnerable to erosion had the least protection. This was inevitable, given the low carbide
loading, low bond strengths, heat affected zones, porosity, and check cracking inherent
with most weld overlays.
The Conforma Clad solution differed in two important ways. First, precise measurements
taken directly from the fan showed that a one-piece liner would protect both the
centerplate and airfoil. This design provided a continuous coating, even in the vulnerable
junction of the centerplate and airfoil, without the need for an exposed weld seam. The
second major difference was weight. The Conforma Clad coating is much lighter than typical
weld overlays, and the process is much less dilutive of the substrate material. Therefore
you can apply it to thinner substrates. The resultant weight reduction meant the utility
could reduce the weight of the entire installation, thus improving efficiency. Or, it
could use the savings to extend wear protection to areas not previously protected. The
utility opted for the latter, and was able, for the first time, to provide additional
protection in the form of liners for the trailing edge.
After six-months of uninterrupted operation, the utility was so pleased with the
results that it authorized further installations. Fans protected with Conforma Clad have
been in operation for more than 18 months now, without causing of an unplanned outage.
Thus, Conforma Clad eliminated a primary cause of expensive, unplanned outages.