The Hoyt Fiasco: A Miscarriage of Justice
Victim information, evidence, rules of law, IRS viewpoints, contact information, and more.

Why did the IRS lead prosecuting attorney in the Hoyt case quit in disgust?

                         

 Join PDFT | HOME

Why the unethical treatment of the Hoyt Victims?  And where's the "missing" $103 million?

The Hoyt Fiasco
4th partner Congressional letter:
Bivens case

The following information is not a solicitation for participation in this lawsuit, but it is a public document being made available for partner use and public information. Partners: Write to your Congressional and House Representatives about this document. Your personal letter can help resolve this Hoyt Fiasco.

We thank the partners (party of Bivens) for allowing this Website to post this serious action so other investors of the Hoyt Fiasco may download it and use it to inform their Congressional leaders of Bivens (Partners Line in the Sand).

A group of partners (greater than 90) represented by Pearson¨ Merriam, P.C. law firm filed a complaint called Bivens Action (damage suit) on December 8, 1999, and a Disclosure suit on December 15, 1999.

In the Bivens case, you'll see things like "Beginning not later than 1982, and continuing to the present, Defendants knowingly, intentionally, recklessly, maliciously and in bad faith, combined, conspired, confederated and agreed with each other, and perhaps with others yet unknown to Plaintiffs, to deprive Plaintiffs of [several subjects (see download)] without due process of law in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States."

It is possible once media are informed of this action, interested parties may contact parties (partners) of this suit. We encourage all partners to refer questions relating to suit(s) to Pearson¨ Merriam, P.C. law firm.

 

Case No. CV99-1717-BR

[PARTNERS] (Names of partners being a party to the suit have been removed)

Clients of Pearson¨ Merriam, P.C., Plaintiffs,

vs.

THOMAS BALLARD; TERESA CASTRO; CHRIS COONES; COLLEEN HADDIGAN; JOHN HALL; THOMAS HEALY; WALTER J. HOYT, III; SUE HULLEN; BLAKE JOHNSON; NORMAN S. JOHNSON; LARRY LINDELOF; BRAD LYLE; WILLIAM MCDEVITT; JOHN MEEK; DANIEL MULHALL; DAVID OSGROD; JILL PAGE; WES POHL; HARRY POTTER; DEBORAH RICHIE; ROBERT SPOONER; LAVONNE TOBIA; MARILYN ULBRICHT; CANDICE MACK; ROBERT PIPPIG; ; JOHN DOEs 1 through 25, Defendants

COMPLAINT

This action is brought for violation of the rights of Plaintiffs under the Constitution and laws of the United States. In support of their complaint for damages, Plaintiffs, [Partner], et al., by and through their attorneys, allege as follows:

 

DISCLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED (Other Legal Actions)

On December 15, 1999 another complaint (C99-2038P) was filed in Seattle Washington by Pearson*Merriam. The disclosure complaint alleges unlawful disclosure by the IRS of client information to the tune of over $140 million dollars. This is the other lawsuit Monty Cobb mentioned in his last update. Download of Disclosure suit currently unavailable.

 

Last updated: Tuesday, July 22, 2008

 

 


Questions, problems? Want to render assistance?
Write to hoyt @mindconnection.com (paste this address into your e-mail program, and delete the space).

Hoyt Fiasco site homepage | Mindconnection homepage


Hosted by http://www.mindconnection.com as a service to the Hoyt victims. To help support the Hoyt Fiasco site with no extra expenditure on your part, click here.

Disclaimer: The facts represented here are as accurate as a reasonable investigation can determine. Mindconnection hosts this site at no charge to the Hoyt victims, with the desire to see this complete miscarriage of justice exposed for what it is.