| Review
of
A Voyage Long and Strange, by Tony Horwitz (Paperback, 2008)
(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you
want a hardcopy)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
A delightful historical narrative! And quite
refreshing in this age of disinformation.
While our public schools continue their relentless
rewriting of history to fit the agenda of special interest groups (such
as the criminal protection lobby's removal of firearms from image of
Washington crossing the Delaware), it's good to come across a book based
on open-minded research. Turning the conventional pattern completely
backwards, Horwitz seeks information and then forms conclusions.
That approach made this book a "keeper." In fact, Horwitz deftly
defrocks a long list of myths, half-truths, and utter fabrications that
are almost canonical today.
He defies another convention by staying on topic.
If you've been offended by books the author uses to segue into political
side issues, you'll be pleased at Horwitz's not doing that.
Tony Horwitz follows the centuries-long European
discovery of the new world. This discovery didn't, as popular myth
holds, start at Plymouth Rock. Nor, as we are told during Thanksgiving
each year, did European settlement begin with the Pilgrims. In fact,
those folks didn't call themselves Pilgrims--that's a label fabricated
for them in much later times.
The discovery, exploration, and settlement
occurred in fits and starts. It was more stumbling and bumbling than it
was heroic conquest. And it was more often brutal than it was noble.
While reading this, I frequently laughed aloud.
Horwitz has a knack for keeping things lively with quips, barbs, and
acerbic wit. His own adventures while visiting the many places discussed
in the book sometimes produced situations that were farcical enough for
a few chuckles. At other times, the people he ran across were,
themselves, hilarious. As entertaining as it is, the real value of this
book its actual information. Horwitz doggedly pursued answers to
questions, and while that pursuit provided ample basis for comedy, it
also provided answers that are worth knowing.
In some cases, that research didn't provide an
answer but merely proved the official propaganda wrong. There are some
things we simply do not and cannot know. When a work purports to be
nonfiction and yet has answers to everything, you can be fairly
confident that work isn't reliable. Horwitz voyage produced some
frustrations for him and left unanswered many questions that would have
been nice to have answered. The fact he doesn't just plug in an answer
he likes makes me fairly confident this work is reliable.
This book is about 400 pages long and contains 15
maps.
The Prologue explains why Horwitz embarked on this
quest. Despite his extensive background in American history, there were
large gaps. And he got to thinking about this. He shares some of those
thoughts in the Prologue.
This book is divided into three Parts:
- Discovery.
- Conquest.
- Settlement.
Part One consists of four chapters, one each for
Vinland (mostly Lief and related Eirickssons), 1492 (Columbus, et al),
Santo Domingo (Columbus again), and Hispaniola (lots of laughs and
oddball characters).
Part Two devotes five chapters to the conquest.
Each chapter covers a separate geographic area: Gulf Coast (an
assortment of Spanish explorers, dandies, and conquistadors), Southwest
(to the seven cities of stone), the plains (the sea of grass that seemed
to swallow up many explorers and potential settlers), the South (De Soto
does Dixie), and the Mississippi. On that last one, I have always
wondered how this river got such an ungainly name. Horwitz reveals the
answer.
Part Three contains four chapters, each of which
provides insight into the settlements in St. Augustine (and other
Florida places), Roanoke (and other Virginia places), Jamestown, and
Plymouth, respectively. The chapter on Plymouth rips apart several
myths, including the many that surround the Thanksgiving holiday.
The source notes and bibliography are extensive,
which would be expected of a book that is this well-researched. What
those reference don't reflect is the sheer footwork Hortwitz did. And I
don't mean figuratively. He actually walked where these explorers,
conquerors, and settlers walked. He visited sites, spoke with other
researchers, and interviewed people who had starkly different views of
what occurred.
All of this research contributed to a credible
work that is also quite funny in places. |